Scott Long wrote:
Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your
specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into
7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active
testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time
David Kirchner wrote:
Here's how to reproduce the snapshot deadlock I'm seeing, with 6.1-RC2
cvsup'd as of 5 or 6 hours ago:
[...]
It locks up every time for me, with no further disk activity.
Unfortunately, for some reason, my server console became unaccessable,
so I'm not able to get to the
I just noticed these messages in my security log on one of my production
servers, running 6.1. Can anyone shed some light as to what is going on
here? This is a dual core opteron system, on a tyan mb, with a nvidia
chipset. The filesystem is on the nvidia raid1 controller.
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Rostislav Krasny wrote:
Hi,
May 13 03:01:29 ns1 kernel: DOH! ata_alloc_composite failed!
May 13 03:01:29 ns1 last message repeated 2 times
I'm not a FreeBSD developer but after looking at the source code I can
say that that kernel message goes from src/sys/dev/ata/ata-raid.c
because
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I recently upgraded my FreeBSD machines from 6.0R to 6.1-STABLE
I noticed a pleasant surprise - improved disk IO!
In 6.0R best sequential throughput I ever saw was 170 MB/s (32k block
size reads on an 4G file). In 6.1-STABLE I'm seeing 190 Mb/s (32k
Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list.
Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock
problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test
patches, if needed.
WBR
IIRC, there are some quota and snapshots
Scott Long wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want
If you use snapshots with your quotas, update to 6.1-STABLE. If you
Sorry, guys. You are mean RELENG_6_1 or
Eduardo Meyer wrote:
Hello,
I need to know which files under /var a proccess (httpd here) is
acessing. It is not logs because I have a different partition for
logs.
Is everyone forgetting the command fstat that comes with freebsd? :)
___
Today i noticed this in the log of one of my systems. Does any one know
what this means? The system has been up for over a month with no problems.
---
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
The hangs are mostly related to snapshots. It would be better to
update to the latest RELENG_6.
Hangs on RELENG_6_1 is not so much interesting. For
hanged RELENG_6 system, please do what described below and post
the log of the ddb session.
I'm not sure whether kbdmux
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
IMHO, core dumps are much harder to deal with in your situation.
I prefer the way of gathering data I described before.
OK, ill try to setup a serial console tomorrow then, ill have to borrow
the cable from another system.
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
I want to set up GEOM mirror of whole existing partitioned 250G disk.
The procedure described at http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/
seems to be rather long/complicated. I thought about using this:
# Boot into single user, then...
# First
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 25, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
The problem with these instructions is that they don't take in to
account the last sector. You may very well end up writing the
metadata on the file system.
When was the last time you fdisk'd a disk and it used the last
Wilko Bulte wrote:
Proper hardware will log the ECC errors, a proper OS tailored to that
hardware will log and notify the sysadmins.
So the question is.. is FreeBSD one of those operating systems? What
features/software is present if any, to report ECC problems?
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Today i noticed this in the log of one of my systems. Does any one
know what this means? The system has been up for over a month with no
problems.
---
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
Mihir Sanghavi wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member to FreeBSD on the whole. I would like to know the
differences between FreeBSD 4.7, 5.X and 6.1. My company is using BSD
4.7 currently and I would like it to change to 5 or 6. What technical
difficulties might I face or how much code would be needed to
Mihir Sanghavi wrote:
Hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 5.5 . My computer is still not hooked to the
network. I would like to start working on it. what should I start with
as I
have never worked with BSD before. are there any good tutorials to start
with?
Thanks
Start again, this time install
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:49:04PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:35:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want
Kostik Belousov wrote:
First, I set the followup to the right mailing list.
Second, I am really curious what you do. My understanding follows: you
have set up vnode-backed md device (md0a) on sparce file, created ufs2
on it, mounted it with quotas, and run background fsck on that fs. At
the
I'm getting a ton of them now, and i found a way to reproduce them.
Basically i run a compile session in one terminal, say make buildkernel,
and run top in another. As soon as i run top, the messages appear, and
they seem to be synchronized with the refresh rate of top, 2 messages
per refresh.
John Baldwin wrote:
That is partly because when you run top it queries the resource usage of the
various processes via fill_kinfo_proc(). When you don't run top, no one is
asking for the resource usage numbers, so the kernel doesn't waste time
calculating them.
Right, also running ps
Martin Nilsson wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:01, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I'm getting a ton of them now, and i found a way to reproduce them.
Basically i run a compile session in one terminal, say make
buildkernel, and run top in another. As soon as i run top
I just setup a new system with MySQL 5.0.22, and to my surprise i get
this error in MySQL's log.
/usr/local/libexec/mysqld: Out of memory (Needed 237527040 bytes)
/usr/local/libexec/mysqld: Out of memory (Needed 178145280 bytes)
The system has 1GB of ram, which is plenty for MySQLs
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+-Le 09/07/2006 16:49 -0400, Mike Jakubik a dit :
| I just setup a new system with MySQL 5.0.22, and to my surprise i get
| this error in MySQL's log.
|
| /usr/local/libexec/mysqld: Out of memory (Needed 237527040 bytes)
| /usr/local/libexec/mysqld: Out of memory (Needed
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+-Le 09/07/2006 14:25 -0700, Darren Pilgrim a dit :
| Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| [kern.maxdsiz is not] a sysctl, it's a tunable thing, which don't
| appear in sysctl.
|
| Gotta love namespace collisions.
Well, in fact, most of the tunables do have a read only sysctl so that
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| Exactly, its nice being able to see the current values. How else can i
| see what the values are set to?
As I previously said, it's 512M on i386, and 1G on 64 bit platforms.
Right, this explains why my amd64 system works just fine. Shouldn't this
be a dynamic
Chuck Swiger wrote:
512MB is more than enough for almost all processes to run just fine,
and is only really inappropriate for the case where you've got 1-plus
GB of physical RAM and want to dedicate the system to a single large
task, or perhaps a single-digit number of processes if you've got
H. Wade Minter wrote:
I'm considering ordering some of these servers to run FreeBSD 6.1 or
6-STABLE on, but they have Intel ICH7R RAID controllers on them.
Googling around, I'm seeing conflicting information as to whether or
they work, or work well enough to use in production.
The chipset
I need to be able to get the cpu and fan information from my
motherboard, however none of the monitoring utilities in the ports seems
to support my motherboard (Supermicro PDSMi, Intel E7230 (Mukilteo)
Chipset). On my older VIA based motherboards and some Nvidia, i can get
this information
John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 07 July 2006 14:43, Mike Jakubik wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
That is partly because when you run top it queries the resource usage of
the various processes via fill_kinfo_proc(). When you don't run top, no
one is asking for the resource usage numbers, so
Bruno Ducrot wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:51:25AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
I need to be able to get the cpu and fan information from my
motherboard, however none of the monitoring utilities in the ports seems
to support my motherboard (Supermicro PDSMi, Intel E7230 (Mukilteo
Are there any plans to MFC the last few commits to kern_resource.c to
-STABLE? I have a number of machines which flood the logs with calcru:
negative runtime messages every time w, ps or top is used, so im hoping
these may fix the issue.
___
David Duchscher wrote:
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Bruno Ducrot wrote:
Does this one support IPMI?
Yes, the Supermicro PDSMi supports the IPMI 2.0 module and I can
confirm that it works with the IPMI ported driver from current on
6.1. The module is optional so you will have to purchase
Jiawei Ye wrote:
On 7/27/06, Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to spend $50 extra per system, just so i can read the
temperature, and not even use any of the IPMI functions. I need a simple
and scriptable way to get the values, acpi sysctls are ideal for this.
What about using
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
FYI, see kern/85106:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85106
Great, i will try the patch shortly.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Well, here are the patch results.
The controller is detected:
ichsmb0: Intel 82801GB (ICH7) SMBus controller port 0x1100-0x111f irq
19 at device 31.3 on pci0
ichsmb0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
smbus0: System Management Bus on ichsmb0
smb0: SMBus generic I/O on smbus0
However communication does not seem
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 18:31, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Are there any plans to MFC the last few commits to kern_resource.c to
-STABLE? I have a number of machines which flood the logs with calcru:
negative runtime messages every time w, ps or top is used, so im hoping
Dominic Marks wrote:
Jerome Sobecki wrote:
Hi all,
We have here some Supermicro Superserver 5015P-TR
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015P-TR.cfm)
Those servers, with a ICH7 controler, are currently working with FreeBSD
6.1 and everything seems ok, except that it's the
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I have same problem on ASUS RS120 with Seagate ST3250820AS/3.AAC
drives (disk loses, system reboots, slow read/write speed), but I
think this is drive problem - all drives has high
Reallocated_Sector_Ct value in SMART (above 130 reallocated sectors
after few weeks,
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=athlon -Werror -D_KERNEL
-DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I-
-I/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../contrib/dev/acpica
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq
-I@/../include
last pid: 747; load averages: 2.69, 1.03, 0.58
up 0+01:40:40 10:14:29
35 processes: 7 running, 28 sleeping
CPU states: 58.1% user, 0.0% nice, 38.4% system, 1.1% interrupt, 2.4%
idle
Mem: 642M Active, 416M Inact, 125M Wired, 112M Buf, 825M Free
Dan Nelson wrote:
How can mysql use 160%? Is this a reporting bug in top because mysql is
threaded?
You have multiple CPUs, so a threaded process can theoretically reach
100*ncpus cpu usage.
Ahh, thats makes sense, thanks.
___
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I upgraded to RELENG_6, changed all HW (whole servers and changed
Seagate HHDs to Samsung so every piece of HW is different from time of
my first post), but after one week I got the same error and system
reboot today:
Aug 19 15:11:20 track ntpd[456]: kernel time sync
Frank wrote:
I am sending this again since it has been 4 days with no response.
I consider this a showstopper since I could boot from CD but
sysinstall could not see the DVD drives, thus no CD install. I had to
mount the CD in another machine and do a NFS install.
SATA optical drives are
Joel Dahl wrote:
The Hardware Notes do not mention SATA at all except for RAID controllers.
Just FYI, We've been looking at integrating the supported hardware info
from the ata(4) manual page into the hardware notes. This *should* at
least kill some of the confusion that always surrounds
Scott Long wrote:
All,
Attached is my first cut at addressing the problems described in this
thread. As I discussed earlier, the VM syncer thread is likely starving
the USB interrupt thread. This causes the shared usb+network
interrupt to remain masked, preventing network interrupts from
Yi-Hua Edward Yang wrote:
I asked the question below a while back but got no answer.
Does that mean BCM5754 integrated GbE will not be supported
by 6.2 release at all? The HARDWARE.TXT file does not list
it, but the source code seems to have the BCM5754 support,
or at least so the CVS comments
Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
Over the weekend and today we got some curious error messages from
gmirror providers:
Oct 7 03:02:14 dtfe2 kernel: ad6: FAILURE - out of memory in start
Oct 7 04:15:58 dtfe2 kernel: ad4: FAILURE - out of memory in
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Those messages are not directly related to gmirror, they come from
the ATA
driver when it can't allocate memory for the structure which describes
I/O request:
I think this behavior is limited to the amd64 architecture
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 10/13/06, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DragonFly has made substantial rewrites/changes since the fork from
FreeBSD.
I think to assume that there are no regressions in either stability,
speed,
or support may be naive.
Has anyone tried benchmarking
Buki wrote:
Hi,
I searched the archives and web a little but found many different opinions
on stability/usability of using make -j# with buildworld (and buildkernel).
So I am asking if it is a good idea to use make -j on production boxes.
I use -j2 on all my dual cpu/core boxes, i don't
Greetings,
I am in the process of implementing a fairly large mysql server for
an even larger company, and naturally i want to use FreeBSD. The
hardware will be an HP DL385, 2 x dual-core Opterons, 16GB RAM, 7 x 15k
rpm disks in a RAID5 setup. I'm not exactly informed as to the specific
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
So, first of all, am i crazy for choosing fbsd+mysql for this
rather than something like Solaris + Oracle? :)
Moderately...it kinda depends on the budget available. I regard
Solaris + Oracle as one of the most reliable
Ronald Klop wrote:
I'm running MySQL 5 on Linux at my work (4 disk RAID 10/32G
RAM/4xsingle-core). It has a DB of 100 GB and much more than
millions of rows and the preformance is very good with quite a lot of
users via the webserver. But I do not have any comparisons with Oracle
or other
I'm curious if the Promise Supertrak SX6000 is still not bootable under
FreeBSD 5.4 or 6. The man page never stated this before, and it would be
nice to know.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, August 10, 2005 6:37 am, Dmitry Mityugov said:
There are Maxtor MaXLine II and III, and perhaps several other models,
that are supposed to work 24/7.
Right, i have a dead 250GB Maxline Plus II drive on my desk, only after
about 1.5 years. At least its still on warranty.
On Sat, August 13, 2005 8:02 pm, Brandon Fosdick said:
So I'm having yet another problem with my AMD64x2/nforce4 system. Of the
two builtin NICs 5.4-S is only recognizing the marvell gigabit chip,
which wasn't a problem until I added a 3ware 9500S-12. With the 3ware
card in the network doesn't
On Sun, August 14, 2005 12:47 am, Brandon Fosdick said:
I had thought of that, but the motherboard only has 2 non-express PCI
slots and they're both currently filled by the video card and the raid
card. I could take the video card out, but then I wouldn't be able to see
what I was doing.
You
On Sun, August 14, 2005 12:47 am, Brandon Fosdick said:
I had thought of that, but the motherboard only has 2 non-express PCI
slots and they're both currently filled by the video card and the raid
card. I could take the video card out, but then I wouldn't be able to see
what I was doing.
On Tue, September 6, 2005 10:35 pm, Daniel O'Connor said:
Hi,
I can't set ar0s1b as my dump partition in 6.0-BETA3, ie
You need ATA Pepto-Bismol!
ha! I couldn'nt resist!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, October 8, 2005 7:43 am, Julien Gabel wrote:
My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's
saying sk0 watchdog timeout after a day or so of operation - temp fix
is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but functional
gigabit PCI 32 card that runs
On Sat, October 8, 2005 1:13 pm, Naseem A. Choudhury wrote:
We have had problems with BGE, but have had good luck with intel FXP and
EMO, but they are expensive.
You get what you pay for.
P.S. Please don't top post on a mailing list.
___
On Sun, October 16, 2005 1:53 pm, Will Saxon wrote:
I completely forgot that I had the partition mounted 'sync'. That might
explain things a bit, huh.
Do NOT mount the partition async, you are asking for filesystem corruption.
I am using qmail - the author indicates that softupdates is not
On Mon, October 17, 2005 11:56 pm, Brett Glass wrote:
Features=0x178bfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PG
E,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT
Features2=0x1SSE3
AMD Features=0xe2500800SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,FFXSR,LM,3DNow+,3DNow
AMD Features2=0x3LAHF,CMP
Multicore:
On Tue, October 18, 2005 12:15 pm, Will Saxon wrote:
BSD has been around since the 70s, any suggestions for something
more modern?
But FreeBSD is in active development. Qmail is not and has not been for
around 7 years.
___
On Tue, October 18, 2005 10:30 pm, Joel Rees wrote:
How come the kernel is reporting that an AMD chip has HTT? Is this
a bug?
No, this is how dual core is reported.
Huh?
Don't scare me like that, Mike.
I guess i got a little confused here. Before multicore detection code was
commited,
On Sat, October 22, 2005 9:41 am, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:30:52 -0400
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he old libraries are still on the system than, aren't they?
Or will they not be used and if not, why?
Use libchk and pkg_which..see their manpages.
On Sat, October 22, 2005 12:25 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
You can run make check-old in /usr/src.
# check-old - Print a list of old files/directories in the
system. # delete-old - Delete obsolete files and directories
interactively. # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete
The AGP does not seem to be detected on this laptop any more, i am
positive that DRM used to work just fine on an earlier 5.x version. This
is what happens why i try to load X.
drm0: ATI Radeon RS100 Mobility U1 port 0x9000-0x90ff mem
0xe000-0xefff,0xd010-0xd010 irq 10 at device
Robert Marella wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:20:06 -0500 (EST)
Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The AGP does not seem to be detected on this laptop any more, i am
positive that DRM used to work just fine on an earlier 5.x version.
This is what happens why i try to load X.
drm0: ATI
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 05:18 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Mon, November 7, 2005 11:49 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please send me 'pciconf -lv' output.
Here it is, thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:class=0x06 card=0x
chip=0xcab01002 rev=0x13
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 05:18 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Mon, November 7, 2005 11:49 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please send me 'pciconf -lv' output.
Here
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion
then? e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems
in the (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only was
better.
Agreed, i have always just used I686, assuming it
Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote:
ad4: 476940MB WDC WD5000KS-00MNB0 06.02E06 at ata2-master SATA150
%dmesg | grep atapci0
atapci0: SiI 3112 SATA150 controller port
0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd480-0xd483,0xd400-0xd407,0xd080-0xd083,0xd000-0xd00f
mem 0xff8fec00-0xff8fedff irq
Unfortunately you have a broken
I am wondering what CPUTYPE and CFLAGS are appropriate when using
Intel's Conroe based Xeons, since GCC 3 is not aware of this CPU, afaik.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Clayton Milos wrote:
Hi Jack
I patched the driver and re-compiled the kernel and userland.
All appears well with the em driver now. No more errors on it.
I am getting watchdog timeouts on the xl driver now though. It was
happenning before at the same time as the em ones. Now I've passed a
Scott Long wrote:
Mike,
If you have insight into the bce driver, I would highly appreciate if
you would share it.
Scott (the guy who fixed bce)
I don't have any bce hardware myself, I'm just using the information
from the list. I have some em and fxp hardware however that i can use to
do
Jack,
I have done some tests, here are my results. On 6.2-BETA3 i was able to
get a timeout while compiling the kernel and ftping a large file from
another server with the same card. On 6.2-STABLE cvsuped today i was not
able to produce a timeout, i then applied your patch and the results
On Tue, November 7, 2006 6:18 pm, Scott Long wrote:
It's just unclear to me how you're associating bce problems with
checksum offloading and IP fragmentation to em problems with design
issues in the watchdog code.
You are correct, the bce watchdog timeouts seem to be related to hw
checksums,
Olivier Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I will soon get some new servers with more than 4 GB of RAM, and
I am wondering if they will work fine even with the PAE
option activated: are all the required drivers (RAID mfid, bce
on the Dell, ciss0 on the HP) 100% compatible, or should I expect
trouble?
Has anyone tried these tests with 4.x? Well, i did, and i was surprised
how good the performance is, it gave me the highest number of all tests,
even compared to much faster HW. Although this is all different
hardware, it seems like the performance drops the higher the version of
FreeBSD is,
Ikare.run wrote:
PS : when error occurs, the disk make a click !?!?
If its making sounds like that, then its a physical problem with the
drive. Bakcup your data and return it if its still on warranty. Maxtor
provides troubleshooting tools on their website.
Chris H. wrote:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP (1102.51-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x680 Stepping = 0
Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
AMD Features=0xc0400800SYSCALL,MMX+,3DNow+,3DNow
That I simply build
Martin Blapp wrote:
Clamd with libpthread.so is still broken. Please use libthr.so. I'm
currently
investigating why libpthreads.so has problems with clamd, and it looks
to me
like a library bug.
This may be related to a problem i had with Mysql on a large server
recently. Mysql threads
Daniel Mouritsen wrote:
Hello,
I'm playing around with using freebsd for my home server (which used
to use
linux), and I have a quick question regarding the distributions you can
select with sysinstall during the install phase.
I've chosen developer(since i wish to use the ports packages, i
Sorry to be a BOFH, but could you guys stop crossposting on this topic? I
think -current is more suitable for this.
Thanks.
* Hides in corner *
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Oliver Fromme said:
I'm not seeing a problem here. Beastie is not a religious icon,
not is it intended to be one.
Right -- but it looks like one. And every now and then
there are people who are offended by it because of their
religious bias.
Boo Hoo! Use Linux then, or is the Penguin
Hello,
There seems to be a problem installing ruby18 on 5-STABLE AMD64. It
compiles cleanly however. No special flags in make.conf.
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 21 11:29:20 EST 2005 amd64
=== Installing for ruby-1.8.2_2
=== Generating temporary packing list
=== Checking if lang/ruby18
Mike said:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Hello,
There seems to be a problem installing ruby18 on 5-STABLE AMD64. It
compiles cleanly however. No special flags in make.conf.
I've had this problem for 2 weeks now on my AMD64.. After ctrl-c on the
make install, miniruby is still
Michael Nottebrock said:
Ehm, you got a *lot* of replies on ports@, including patches to test (the
first person to reply cut you from cc however). You might want to check
the
archives.
Great, im not subscribed to ports :P. Thanks for the info!
Michael Nottebrock said:
Ehm, you got a *lot* of replies on ports@, including patches to test (the
first person to reply cut you from cc however). You might want to check
the archives.
Just an FYI. The following patch seems to work for me. Tested with
portupgrade.
On Fri, April 15, 2005 5:13 am, Ulrik Guenther said:
on my 5.4-RC1 installation with a 3com 3c905B NIC I got the following
messages while transferring a big file (31GByte) over 100MBit ethernet:
Apr 15 08:46:18 verleihnix kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90
Apr 15 08:46:18 verleihnix kernel:
On Mon, April 18, 2005 9:38 pm, Colin Percival said:
Ken Smith wrote:
The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is pleased to announce the
availability of FreeBSD 5.4-RC3 [...] We encourage people to help with
testing [...]
I've been running 5.4-RC2 for the past week without problems (and -RC1
On Thu, April 28, 2005 4:53 pm, Sylvio Cesar said:
when will go to leave the 5,4 stable? The calendar speaks that already it
must have left in day 26/04.
Basically whenever the developers and release team feel that its ready.
The posted timeline is more of a rough guide, and not strict rule.
On Mon, May 9, 2005 1:06 pm, Scott Long said:
5.3 ships with SMP turned on, which makes lock operations rather
expensive on single-processor machines. 4.x does not have SMP turned on by
default. Would you be able to re-run your test with SMP turned off?
This is what i get on my system,
Hello,
Could someone tell me why our bootloader still can not recognize a ntfs
partition, and report it as Windows instead of displaying ?? ?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On Wed, May 18, 2005 4:24 pm, Brooks Davis said:
There isn't enough space to support all 256 partition types in the 512
bytes of space available to the mbr. Fancy multi-sector options are
available, but we don't provide them. Many people consider this a
feature. :)
Well that sucks :P Maybe
On Wed, May 18, 2005 4:28 pm, Dan Nelson said:
The next release should:
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/boot/i386/boot0/boot0.S,v
revision 1.14 date: 2005/02/08 20:43:04; author: des; state: Exp;
lines: +2 -2
Remove type 0x4 (FAT12 32MB) to make room for type 0x7 (NTFS).
revision
Do these lists have a moderator or is he on vacation? Im tired of deleting
this useless thread from my mailbox.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On Mon, May 23, 2005 3:42 pm, Colin Percival said:
http://www.freebsd.org/security/
In addition to the material there (which is concerned with existing
releases), FreeBSD 5.x is expected to be supported until late 2007
(FreeBSD 5.5 plus two
years), and FreeBSD 6.x will probably be
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
