Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-03 Thread Polichism


- Original Message - 
From: Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Silves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'FreeBSD Current' 
freebsd-current@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released



Silves wrote:

On Sat, 2006-Apr-01 13:25:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote:

  ^^^

It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.



I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being
developed ?
This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
Is there any special reason for this ?


Look at the date on Scott's email. :-)

Colin Percival



Euh, I tought 1 April whas over and still not trapped on a joke.
But now. *nvmd*  :-P

Harrie Bos 


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Jack Raats

Scott,

There's something strange with this release. 
Yesterday it worked fantastic, better than the FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE. 
Today it refuses to start :-)


Jack


It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
and their pets.  Significant features in this release:

http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 13:25:59 -0700
Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
 FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN

Woah there - does that mean that 1.1.6 might be out soon too ?

-- 
C:WIN  |   Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins.| A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. |licences available see
|http://www.sohara.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi!

On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:48:21AM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:

  It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
  FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
 
   Woah there - does that mean that 1.1.6 might be out soon too ?

That will be 1.1.5.2, of course. RELENG_1 is in maintenance mode,
now.

:-)
Patrick
-- 
punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung
Vorholzstr. 25Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100
76137 Karlsruhe   http://punkt.de
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 12:02:38PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Patrick M. Hausen, and lo! it spake thus:
 
 That will be 1.1.5.2, of course. RELENG_1 is in maintenance mode,
 now.

Y'know, I DO have a box running RELENG_2_1_0...


-- 
Matthew Fuller (MF4839)   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
   On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Holger Kipp
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:25:59PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
 FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
 months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
 and their pets.  Significant features in this release:

Ah, at last I can upgrade my old 2.2.8 without hassle. A minor note (maybe
I am getting this wrong): my 2.2.8 is from January 1999, so shouldn't this
be 87 months instead of 77?

 - - The 8GB barrier in IDE drive sizes has finally been broken.  The wd(4)
   driver now supports unimaginable sizes of 137GB on a single drive!

Hmm, the 4GB SCSI is still working fine here - and I still have a spare drive
for replacement, but that is good news anyway.

 A full description of the release can be found here:
 
   ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.9-RELEASE/README.TXT
   ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.9-RELEASE/RELNOTES.TXT

Looks okay to me. I am still missing support for IBMs Microchannel, though.
Any chance this will be ready for the next release (2.2.10)?

Anyway, thanks a lot to all involved for making FreeBSD even better ;-)

Regards,
Holger

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Scott Long

Holger Kipp wrote:

On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:25:59PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:


It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
and their pets.  Significant features in this release:



Ah, at last I can upgrade my old 2.2.8 without hassle. A minor note (maybe
I am getting this wrong): my 2.2.8 is from January 1999, so shouldn't this
be 87 months instead of 77?



Yeah, I realized that I screwed up the math after I sent it out.  I 
actually meant 89, since 2.2.8 was officially released in Nov 1998.  I

think that the CD's were issued a couple of months after that.




- - The 8GB barrier in IDE drive sizes has finally been broken.  The wd(4)
 driver now supports unimaginable sizes of 137GB on a single drive!



Hmm, the 4GB SCSI is still working fine here - and I still have a spare drive
for replacement, but that is good news anyway.



4GB SCSI drive?  You were a big spender at the time =-D




A full description of the release can be found here:

 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.9-RELEASE/README.TXT
 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.9-RELEASE/RELNOTES.TXT



Looks okay to me. I am still missing support for IBMs Microchannel, though.
Any chance this will be ready for the next release (2.2.10)?


Have the MicroChannel patents expired yet?



Anyway, thanks a lot to all involved for making FreeBSD even better ;-)

Regards,
Holger



Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Doug Hardie


On Apr 2, 2006, at 12:22, Holger Kipp wrote:


On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:25:59PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:

It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY- 
SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their  
children,

and their pets.  Significant features in this release:


Ah, at last I can upgrade my old 2.2.8 without hassle. A minor note  
(maybe
I am getting this wrong): my 2.2.8 is from January 1999, so  
shouldn't this

be 87 months instead of 77?


The developers were afraid that 2.2.8 might not be solid, so they  
decided to wait 10 months before updating any of the development or  
test machines until those using it in production had time to find all  
the bugs.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-02 Thread Derek KuliƱski
Hello Colin,

Saturday, April 1, 2006, 2:43:13 PM, you wrote:

 Look at the date on Scott's email. :-)

Yeah, It's all wrong he set his clock 7 years into the future.

-- 
Best regards,
 Derekmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.takeda.tk

-- RAM disk is *not* an installation procedure.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sat, 2006-Apr-01 13:25:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
and their pets.  Significant features in this release:

Thank you for this.  I was beginning to think the 2.2 branch had been
abandoned - the mailing lists seem full of references to 5.5 and 6.1
these days.  Can you please advise what CVSup tag I should use to
upgrade to 2.2.9.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread Silves

Peter Jeremy wrote:

On Sat, 2006-Apr-01 13:25:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
  

It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
and their pets.  Significant features in this release:



Thank you for this.  I was beginning to think the 2.2 branch had been
abandoned - the mailing lists seem full of references to 5.5 and 6.1
these days.  Can you please advise what CVSup tag I should use to
upgrade to 2.2.9.

  

Hi,

I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being 
developed ?

This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
Is there any special reason for this ?

I work with FreeBSD since 3.5 and today my machines are working with 6.0

Thank you FreeBSD Developers for all your work !
I'm proud to say to my friends that i ONLY use FreeBSD on my machines !

Cheers,
Silves




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread Marc G. Fournier

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Silves wrote:


Peter Jeremy wrote:

On Sat, 2006-Apr-01 13:25:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote:


It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
and their pets.  Significant features in this release:



Thank you for this.  I was beginning to think the 2.2 branch had been
abandoned - the mailing lists seem full of references to 5.5 and 6.1
these days.  Can you please advise what CVSup tag I should use to
upgrade to 2.2.9.



Hi,

I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being developed 
?

This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
Is there any special reason for this ?


Check the date of the announce .. ?:)


Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread Colin Percival
Silves wrote:
 On Sat, 2006-Apr-01 13:25:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
   ^^^
 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
 FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.

 I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being
 developed ?
 This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
 Is there any special reason for this ?

Look at the date on Scott's email. :-)

Colin Percival

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 4/1/06, Silves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being
 developed ?

The same reason Slashdot is now in purple with the OMG Ponies!!! theme.

 This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
 Is there any special reason for this ?

Check the date. :)

Scott
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread Silves

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Silves wrote:


Peter Jeremy wrote:

On Sat, 2006-Apr-01 13:25:59 -0700, Scott Long wrote:


It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of 
SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their 
children,

and their pets.  Significant features in this release:



Thank you for this.  I was beginning to think the 2.2 branch had been
abandoned - the mailing lists seem full of references to 5.5 and 6.1
these days.  Can you please advise what CVSup tag I should use to
upgrade to 2.2.9.



Hi,

I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being 
developed ?

This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
Is there any special reason for this ?


Check the date of the announce .. ?:)


Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services 
(http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 
7615664




Ho ! i understand now !
I can't beleave !! lololol

Thanks Scott hehehehe
This was really a stupid question ! :-)
I was caught ! 


Thanks guys !


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread NAKAMURA Takeshi

On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 06:58:50 +1000,
 Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thank you for this.  I was beginning to think the 2.2 branch had been
 abandoned - the mailing lists seem full of references to 5.5 and 6.1
 these days.  Can you please advise what CVSup tag I should use to
 upgrade to 2.2.9.

 It likes `csv -rApril_Fool'
+1+2+3+4+5+6+
 NAKAMURA Takeshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Today is `1 April 2006' in USA.

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread jdow

From: Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 2.2.9-RELEASE.  This release is the culmination of SEVENTY-SEVEN
months of tireless work by the FreeBSD developers, users, their children,
and their pets.  Significant features in this release:

- - XFree86 3.3.3, the industry leader in support for cutting edge PCI
 graphics adapters and 2D acceleration.
- - The 8GB barrier in IDE drive sizes has finally been broken.  The wd(4)
 driver now supports unimaginable sizes of 137GB on a single drive!
- - Support for all of the latest high-speed FAST-WIDE (20MB/s) SCSI-2
 controllers.
- - The Linux emulator is now able to run Quake2 out-of-the-box.

A full description of the release can be found here:

 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.9-RELEASE/README.TXT
 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/2.2.9-RELEASE/RELNOTES.TXT


It won't boot on my Tyan K8W motherboard with two dual Opterons. What
should I do! I'm in a panic to get it back on the net. Withdrawal
symptoms are setting in. The trembling nifgers has beginned.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@]

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 2.2.9 Released

2006-04-01 Thread jdow

From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 4/1/06, Silves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have just one curious question, why is FreeBSD 2.2.x still being
developed ?


The same reason Slashdot is now in purple with the OMG Ponies!!! theme.


This is maybe a stupid question, but i am only curious to know why ?
Is there any special reason for this ?


Check the date. :)

 jdow  And just who gets the gotcha here?

{^_^}   Joanne, A satisfied customer of Google Romance,
   http://www.google.com/romance/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]