The following reply was made to PR usb/74989; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Julien Gabel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: usb/74989: (regression) Lost USB support between 5.2.1-RELEASE
> Ok, yours is a more odd case. :) This is debatably a bug in your ASL,
> but I think we can work around it. It is routing your USB interrupts
> to IRQ 10 but is not using a link device to do it, and it is not
> including an INTR_OVERRIDE entry in the MADT to change IRQ 10 from the
> default of e
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The USB stuff, btw, is confusingly located in uhub.c. There are a
number of bugs in the newbus integration of usb, and various people
have tried to fix it. In usbland uhub is the bus, not the usb device,
which is confusing at first, and poorly docume
The following reply was made to PR usb/74989; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: usb/74989: (regression) Lost USB support between 5.2.1-RELEASE
and 5.3-REL
On Thursday 01 December 2005 04:34 pm, Julien Gabel wrote:
> >> I applied this patch, rebuild and installed the kernel, set the
> >> loader.conf directive `hint.apic.0.disabled' to "0" and reboot on the
> >> system. Sadly, the same behaviour happened (as before), i.e. USB mouse
> >> simply hang, U
wawo !
thanks again sir :)
that really benifit me alot :)
On 12/2/05, M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I suspect that if one were to write a hot-plug PCI bus bridge that it
> would mostly work similar to cbb, but with some differences due to API
>
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
kylin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: thank u,sir :)
: i have been reading ur pccbb code for a long time . really
: elegant.here I think my ignorace is partly because the lack of reading
: to the doc about the generic device architecture .but frankly ,i
thank u,sir :)
i have been reading ur pccbb code for a long time . really
elegant.here I think my ignorace is partly because the lack of reading
to the doc about the generic device architecture .but frankly ,i
still haven't fount the newbus-draft :(
mention to pccbb ,i wonder the reason why pcca
