On Wednesday 04 May 2011 00:29:32 free...@johnea.net wrote:
> > Could you try 8-stable?
>
> I've always used binary updates on this machine. What about 8.2?
Then you would need to wait for 8.3.
>
> > Also it might be worth trying an XHCI (USB 3.0) host controller device.
>
> I'm not exactly s
On 05/04/2011 01:04 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 May 2011 00:29:32 free...@johnea.net wrote:
>>> Could you try 8-stable?
>>
>> I've always used binary updates on this machine. What about 8.2?
>
> Then you would need to wait for 8.3.
Just as a matter of trying to understand US
On Wednesday 04 May 2011 17:35:38 free...@johnea.net wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 01:04 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 May 2011 00:29:32 free...@johnea.net wrote:
> >>> Could you try 8-stable?
> >>
> >> I've always used binary updates on this machine. What about 8.2?
> >
> > Then y
On 2011-05-04 09:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
The quirk prevents the conflict between hid and ugen (which occurred in
7.1), Why can't 8.1 recognize the device?
Could you point at the patch that fixed this issue?
I don't know an exact pr number, but I think it was just this addition to the
We have a system that experiences occasional stalls due to ESD strikes in
the cable between the host & hub. So I've been extensively testing the clear
stall logic.
It's done two different ways in the standard drivers. In if_cdce it's:
if (error != USB_ERR_CANCELLED) {
usbd
On Thursday 05 May 2011 03:16:14 Trevor Blackwell wrote:
> We have a system that experiences occasional stalls due to ESD strikes in
> the cable between the host & hub. So I've been extensively testing the
> clear stall logic.
>
Hi,
> It's done two different ways in the standard drivers. In if_c
On Thursday 05 May 2011 03:16:14 Trevor Blackwell wrote:
> We have a system that experiences occasional stalls due to ESD strikes in
> the cable between the host & hub. So I've been extensively testing the
> clear stall logic.
Which version of FreeBSD are you using?
--HPS