Roger. This is it. Thanks!
On 28.01.2013, at 3:05, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Hi,
Can you try this patch:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/245995
It fixes the issue for me. Looks like I overlooked a corner case computing
the
DMA addresses. Thanks for
Thank you, Pawel.
Hans, can please you take a look at your commits done on Dec 20 (r244500 and
r244503)?
They are seems to be the culprit.
On 23.01.2013, at 22:46, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:11:23PM +0900, Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
And now both
On Sunday 27 January 2013 13:52:20 Alexander Nedotsukov wrote:
Thank you, Pawel.
Hans, can please you take a look at your commits done on Dec 20 (r244500
and r244503)? They are seems to be the culprit.
Hi,
I don't have 10-current machine here right now, but I tried the following on a
On Sunday 27 January 2013 16:59:02 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I don't have 10-current machine here right now, but I tried the following
on a 9-stable machine:
BTW: 9-stable does not have the patches you wanted me to look at. Is this
issue reproducible in stock 9-stable at your side or
On Sunday 27 January 2013 17:15:02 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 27 January 2013 16:59:02 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I don't have 10-current machine here right now, but I tried the following
on a 9-stable machine:
BTW: 9-stable does not have the patches you wanted me to look at. Is
Hi,
Can you try this patch:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/245995
It fixes the issue for me. Looks like I overlooked a corner case computing the
DMA addresses. Thanks for reporting!
zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE
Borrowed USB stick today and did same excersize as below (# zpool create tank
raidz da5{d,e,f}) with exactly same outcome.
On 19.01.2013, at 23:26, Alexander Nedotsukov bl...@bbnest.net wrote:
Hi All,
Just a note that after catch up with -current my zfs pool kissed good bye.
I'll omit
