Re: priv_check/make_dev/devfs.rules: What is preventing a device to show up in a jail?
On 2013-06-13, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Can we introduce a new syntax while keeping the old behaviour? > > path zvol/* hide-r > path zvol/* unhide-r > > I think this will be more accepted than changing existing behaviour! IMHO, the old behavior is so confusing and unintuitive that we should not maintain it. Can you clarify how "hide-r" and "unhide-r" would differ from plain "hide" and "unhide". The current syntax already uses pattern matching via fnmatch(9). > Is this stack element really needed? > > + char specname[SPECNAMELEN + 1]; Need to check if M_WAITOK malloc is possible here. -- Jaakko ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: priv_check/make_dev/devfs.rules: What is preventing a device to show up in a jail?
On 05/10/13 21:33, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:43:47 +0200 Uffe Jakobsen wrote: On 2013-05-10 12:11, Alexander Leidinger wrote: I worry about what is going on. We have something which is supposed to provide security as required, but is does not seem to work as described. We either need to fix the documentation, or a bug in the code. To do the later it needs to be debugged. It seems to me that you are struggeling with this - or a related - problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/122838 Indeed, this is the problem. I have all entries visible now. Anyone interested to have this changed (as suggested by Andriy in the PR) should voice his opinion. I voiced mine already. Bye, Alexander. Hi, Can we introduce a new syntax while keeping the old behaviour? path zvol/* hide-r path zvol/* unhide-r I think this will be more accepted than changing existing behaviour! Is this stack element really needed? + char specname[SPECNAMELEN + 1]; --HPS ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: priv_check/make_dev/devfs.rules: What is preventing a device to show up in a jail?
On Fri, 10 May 2013 13:43:47 +0200 Uffe Jakobsen wrote: > On 2013-05-10 12:11, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > I worry about what is going on. We have something which is supposed > > to provide security as required, but is does not seem to work as > > described. We either need to fix the documentation, or a bug in the > > code. To do the later it needs to be debugged. > > > > It seems to me that you are struggeling with this - or a related - > problem: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/122838 Indeed, this is the problem. I have all entries visible now. Anyone interested to have this changed (as suggested by Andriy in the PR) should voice his opinion. I voiced mine already. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 ___ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
