Hi,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Howard Leadmon wrote:
It is currently under CentOS 6.4, and sending a -version to qemu-kvm gives
me the following:
QEMU PC emulator version 0.12.1 (qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2), Copyright (c) 2003-2008
Fabrice Bellard
In case it matters I have several 10.0-RC4 and 10.0-RC5 VMs
-Original Message-
From: Christian Kratzer [mailto:ck-li...@cksoft.de]
In case it matters I have several 10.0-RC4 and 10.0-RC5 VMs running just
fine
under KVM on CentOS 6.5
Can you let me know what virt-install options you used to accomplish this?
Outside of that, I am guessing
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Howard Leadmon wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christian Kratzer [mailto:ck-li...@cksoft.de]
In case it matters I have several 10.0-RC4 and 10.0-RC5 VMs running just
fine
under KVM on CentOS 6.5
Can you let me know what virt-install options you used to
Hello,
do you see any particolar problem (devices who need to have the owner
changed, limitations of any kind...?) in running BHyVe as non-root?
--
*Andrea BrancatelliSchema 31 S.r.l. - Socio UnicoResponsabile ITROMA -
FIRENZE - PALERMO ITALYTel: +39. 06.98.358.472*
*Cell: +39
Hello everyone,
does someone know how to check if the paravirtualized I/O drivers from Xen are
loaded/working in FreeBSD 10? To my understanding it isn't necessary anymore to
compile a custom kernel with PVHVM enabled, right? In /var/log/messages/ I can
see the XN* and XBD* devices and the
On 16/01/14 17:41, Sydney Meyer wrote:
Hello everyone,
does someone know how to check if the paravirtualized I/O drivers from Xen
are loaded/working in FreeBSD 10? To my understanding it isn't necessary
anymore to compile a custom kernel with PVHVM enabled, right? In
/var/log/messages/ I
Well then, thanks for the hint.. dmesg shows the following:
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: Virtual Network Interface at device/vif/0
on xenbusb_front0
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xn0: Ethernet address: 00:16:3e:df:1b:5a
Jan 16 18:22:30 bsd10 kernel: xenbusb_back0: Xen Backend Devices on
+1, very interested to hear about how this could be done. jailed bhyves even ??
On 16 January 2014 14:47, Andrea Brancatelli abrancate...@schema31.it wrote:
Hello,
do you see any particolar problem (devices who need to have the owner
changed, limitations of any kind...?) in running BHyVe as
Hi Andrea,
do you see any particolar problem (devices who need to have the owner
changed, limitations of any kind...?) in running BHyVe as non-root?
There's 2 issues - firstly, bhyve is new and hasn't had a lot of
exposure. It's probably safest to restrict it to root for a while to
avoid
