On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors:
* bhyve
* KVM
* QEMU
* VirtualBox
Make that 5:
* Xen: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0
Altough FreeBSD doesn't
El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
Hi all,
first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long
time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am
trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virtualization needs.
So, for my many questions:
As far
El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit:
On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors:
* bhyve
* KVM
* QEMU
* VirtualBox
Make that 5:
* Xen:
Hello,
El 01/04/15 a les 16.27, Gerd Hafenbrack ha escrit:
On 2015-04-01 16:19, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit:
... thanks for pointing Xen out. I was indeed not aware of Xen
running on
FreeBSD, an intriguing (and well known) alternative.
The wiki says,
On 2015-04-01 16:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello,
El 01/04/15 a les 16.27, Gerd Hafenbrack ha escrit:
... The documentation for FreeBSD as Dom0 seems outdated anyway to me.
The document was last modified on the 15th of March 2015. I know things
move fast in the IT industry, but I wouldn't
Udo Rader wrote:
...
I understand, that bhyve is native to BSD and will probably be the most
effective. But given its relatively 'young age', is it production ready
for (non nested) x86/amd64 linux guests?
there's no libvirt for bhyve yet, which turns some people off. (not me,
i don't use
Hi all,
I found the source of the problem. Once upon a time I compiled my
kernel with OFED support (WITH_OFED in /etc/src.conf). That installed
$INCLUDE/rdma/rdma_cma.h, which at the time of the installation (haven't
checked now) were missing the rdma_addrinfo structs.
Moving
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
there's no libvirt for bhyve yet, which turns some people off.
Wrong.
See:
https://libvirt.org/drvbhyve.html
http://www.slideshare.net/CraigRodrigues1/libvirt-bhyve
libvirt/bhyve is definitely not as polished as
