I have an AMD "hammer" (9590) running a bhyve with a VM that used to be a
"droplet". All is good if I run "vm -f start " it works. That
is: the console is attached to stdin/stdout of the vm command.
If, however, I start without the -f, I get the linux kernel "not" booting
with output of:
[
remember that the quoted problem is spit out by the guest, not the host.
That said, the 'top' line on the frozen bhyve was:
29380 root 22 200 1060M 928M kqread 5 218:32 399.30% bhyve
... indicating that the bhyve had almost all it's memory... and the system
had also 500M free
I tried the -p 0:1 -p 1:2 -p 2:3 -p 3:4 bit. If I may say, it felt a
little "chunky" ... but that could have just been a perception.
Anyways... still hung the guest.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Peter Grehan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What should be next steps here? This is
oh ... and ... the console spit out:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: bufobj: 0, blkno: 4522, size: 8192
(swap is on a separate zVol).
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbee...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> ... curiously, top running on the guest reveals (the point
pfault 0 0:04 35.11%
llvm-tblgen
88743 root 1 520 55460K 26392K pfault 3 0:00 10.23% cc
... where top on the host just shows 100% bhyve 100% busy on 4 threads.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbee...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Since I found out that I
obably gonna need some manual
> commands to get it to boot.
>
> On Sep 19, 2016 12:48 AM, "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So... I'm trying to boot a debian 8.5 live CD. The directions @
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/virtualization-host-
So... I'm trying to boot a debian 8.5 live CD. The directions @
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/virtualization-host-bhyve.html drive
me to booting this with
*grub-bhyve -m device.map -r cd0 -M 1024M linuxguest*
... which fails because the cd image doesn't contain /boot/grub. I've
tried
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault ben.perra...@gmail.com
wrote:
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new
issues or unknowns what so
Heh. VirtualBox has (in my experience) been buggy as heck. Beyond buggy
as heck.
I have 3 virtualization platforms at my disposal (and the host here is win
7). VirtualBox, VMWare and Windows Virtual PC. I can report that under
VirtualBox, every major type of guest caused stability problems