On Monday 22 July 2013 21:01:31 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here.
>
> So - what's the "right" behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the
> assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet
> tag/state is set?
To the best of my knowledge,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there.
> We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set
> that.
>
>
What do you think about Marko's suggestion to de-virtualize
V_pf_mtag_z? What would
Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here.
So - what's the "right" behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the
assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet
tag/state is set?
-adrian
On 22 July 2013 11:59, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 A
On 22 July 2013 08:43, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this comes from the eventhandlers pf installs to handle
> ifnet events. It seems like a wifi event causes this code to run
> and the context is not set. Does the panic happen only when you
> use vnet jails?
>
> Could you try putting
On 07/22/13 09:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I used a kernel config with the following lines:
include GENERIC
options VIMAGE
and compiled a CURRENT kernel from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head@253346 .
I also have PF enabled on my system.
Once in a while I have been getting kernel panics lik
On Monday 22 July 2013 08:57:43 Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do
> > we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path?
>
> I'm not sure about that.
> In src/s
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do
> we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path?
>
I'm not sure about that.
In src/sys/netpfil/pf/pf.c, we have this in pf_initialize():
751
hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do
we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path?
-adrian
On 21 July 2013 23:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used a kernel config with the following lines:
>
> include GENERIC
> options VIMAGE
>
>
Hi,
I used a kernel config with the following lines:
include GENERIC
options VIMAGE
and compiled a CURRENT kernel from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head@253346 .
I also have PF enabled on my system.
Once in a while I have been getting kernel panics like these:
=
