Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 04:48, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/18/2009 8:16 PM, Peter wrote:
I have a machine running Win/XP Pro SP3 hosting VirtualBox 3.1.
The hardware happily boots the Ubuntu amd64 CDROM natively and FreeBSD 8.0
also boots fine - well ... up to the point
Hi Guys
Another PR, this time with a xen/hvm virtual machine running FreeBSD 8/i386
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141848&cat=kern
Regards
Sevan / Venture37
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On 12/21/2009 4:42 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Marius Nünnerich wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 04:48, Tim Daneliuk
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2009 8:16 PM, Peter wrote:
> I have a machine running Win/XP Pro SP3 hosting VirtualBox 3.1.
>
> The hardware happily boots the Ubuntu amd64 CDROM na
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Hi Guys
Another PR, this time with a xen/hvm virtual machine running FreeBSD 8/i386
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141848&cat=kern
looking at the images (below, for others)
http://img691.imageshack.us/i/screenshot20091221at171.png/
http://img709.imageshac
On 21/12/2009 18:53, Julian Elischer wrote:
I see that it is in pf.
pf was not virtualized in 8.0 and while it the work has been done,
I'm not acually sure if it was committed yet in 9.
were you using pf on any other vimage setup? I'm guessing not.
You're right, no I wasn't, funnily enough th
