Re: New vendor branch for FreeBSD on Hyper-V. Please review.

CTS_SCSI_FLAGS_TAG_ENB flag. While I guess it should not cause any problems, it wont allow user to control it if he decide to experiment with disabling it. -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: ATA controller and Hyper-V synthetic storage driver handle the IDE disks devices ( but not for the CD-ROM) Re: Hyper-V on FreeBSD

be better to boot from SCSI completely and forget about ATA? Or there is no option ROM for SCSI boot in Hyper-V? -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization

Re: more granular detection and control to disable/enable PCI-ATA devices

modular and non-invasive. -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: [Hyper-V][camlock] storvsc driver panics during boot with patches from camlock project

: owner-freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Oleg Sidorkin Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:21 AM To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander Motin Subject: [Hyper-V][camlock] storvsc driver panics during boot with patches from

Re: Bhyve storage improvements

. -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Bhyve storage improvements (was: Several bhyve quirks)

, and the copying is not free. May be some cases could be optimized to work without copying but with some clever page mapping, but that seems absolutely not trivial. -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http

[Differential] [Updated] D5473: ATA/ATAPI6 device emulation in bhyve

mav added a comment. It was definitely significant amount of work, but I am not sure what motivation was behind it. Why do we need it after already having much more featured AHCI-based ATA/ATAPI emulation? Are there any significant OS not supporting AHCI? There is significant amount of

[Differential] [Commented On] D5473: ATA/ATAPI6 device emulation in bhyve

mav added a comment. In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5473#117346, @iateaca wrote: > The motivation is to run older versions of operating systems such as FreeBSD 4 which does not have AHCI drivers. > What do you mean by code duplication ? I think only the ATAPI CDROM logic could be