Re: HEADS UP: Imported Xen 4.7: no blkback

2016-06-08 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > One of the more relevant changes in 4.7 regarding FreeBSD is the support for > block hotplug scripts. This means that we now have the option to use > backends different than simple block or regular files, provided that someone > writes the proper

Re: HEADS UP: Imported Xen 4.7 and blkback changes - domU respawning on_crash

2016-06-08 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > First of all, this message is only relevant to those that use FreeBSD as > > Dom0 (host), not as a DomU (guest), so don't panic. > > > > I'v

Re: HEADS UP: Imported Xen 4.7: no blkback

2016-06-10 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:16:59AM +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > > One of the more relevant changes in 4.7 regarding FreeBSD is the support > > > for > &

Re: HEADS UP: Imported Xen 4.7: no blkback

2016-06-13 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Since you mention that the console is very slow, if you run 'top' on Dom0, > do you see any process (eg: qemu) taking a lot of CPU time? > > Also, do you see Dom0 consuming a lot of CPU if you run 'xentop'? Just quick info regarding console problem

Re: HEADS UP: Imported Xen 4.7: no blkback

2016-06-13 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 09:38:59PM +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > "?" does not work - it mostly causes a panic, the console is slow, but I > > managed > > to switch it to /dev/ada0p2, dmesg below: > > This ha

Re: HEADS UP: Imported Xen 4.7: no blkback

2016-06-16 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > I've just imported Xen 4.7.0-rc6 into the ports tree, could you give it a > try when you have a moment? Yes, of course. A quick test shows no change - Windows get stuck at the UEFI shell with some block devices listed (I use "hda" for Windows),

Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?

2016-04-25 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > I have managed to make zpool boot again by doing voodoo > > similar to this one: > > > > [root@rescue ~]# zpool import -R /mnt zroot > > [root@rescue ~]# mount -t devfs devfs /mnt/dev > > [root@rescue ~]# chroot /mnt /bin/tcsh > > > > (... Running

Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?

2016-04-25 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > TBH, I have no idea. Can you also paste the log of the system (Xen + > > FreeBSD) when it fails to boot? If that's not possible, can you at least > > paste the output of `xl dmesg`

Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?

2016-04-25 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > TBH, I have no idea. Can you also paste the log of the system (Xen + > > > FreeBSD) when it fails to boot? If that's

Re: Booting Windows/UEFI (was Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?)

2016-04-26 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:24:30AM +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > I got lazy and I have downloaded > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/edk2/files/OVMF/OVMF-X64-r15214.zip/download > > > > recompiled xen-tool

Booting Windows/UEFI (was Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?)

2016-04-26 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > You will have to boot it using OVMF, which is not compiled with Xen by > > default. I will try to add an OVMF package (like the SeaBIOS one that we > > already have), and wi

Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?

2016-04-23 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On a freshly installed (via upgrade from 10.3 from source) -CURRENT on this machine: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r298488: Sat Apr 23 11:10:01 UTC 2016 r...@o.saper.info:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 FreeBSD clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final 262564) (based on LLVM 3.8.0) WARNING:

Booting Solaris 11.3 (was Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?)

2016-04-28 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:39:06AM +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > By the way, I just managed to crash a whole machine by trying to > > boot Solaris 11.3: > > > > # builder = "hvm" > > memory = 2048 &

Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?

2016-04-26 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > You will have to boot it using OVMF, which is not compiled with Xen by > default. I will try to add an OVMF package (like the SeaBIOS one that we > already have), and wire it into the xen-tools package. > > If you want to try it yourself, you can

Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?

2016-04-26 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > libxl: error: libxl.c:6121:libxl_xen_console_read_line: reading console > > > ring buffer: Cannot allocate memory > > > > It seems that my problem was ... > > > > vm.max_wired=1 > > > > in /boot/loader.conf > > > > instead of > > > >

Re: bhyve: unhandled inl 0x402

2016-04-29 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Craig, > > > I am seeing this errors in in the latest bhyve code in CURRENT: > > > > acpi0: on motherboard > > Unhandled inl 0x0402 at 0x8039c2bd > > Hmmm, that's a 4-byte read from the ACPI PM1 control register, which is > advertized as

Re: Booting Solaris 11.3 (was Re: Booting r298488 as Xen Dom0 may break ZFS pool?)

2016-05-05 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 08:56:54PM +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > > > Certainly. I assumed that you meant it crashed the VM, not the whole > > > host. > > > Can you please provide the trace of the crash? > > >

Re: vm-bhyve, routing a subnet behind the main ip, is this a good / "correct" solution?

2019-03-25 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Mathias Picker wrote: > Hi all, > > this is the first time I tried to use bhyve. > > This is 12.0-RELEASEp3 and vm-bhyve 1.2.3. > > My hosting provider hetzner.de is giving out subnets which are routed through > the main ip of the server, > so if my main IP is

Re: The status of docker

2019-01-31 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > There is nothing docker-like in FreeBSD. Sure, we have jails and bhyve but > they are faaar from the convenience and support of docker containers that you > can pull directly from docker hub and have a complete application running in a > few lines of