On 30 Nov 2014, at 10:04 , Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/29/14, 5:28 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org
mailto:jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
also look at the following: (a little dated)
On 12/2/14, 7:31 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 30 Nov 2014, at 10:04 , Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/29/14, 5:28 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org
mailto:jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
also look at the following: (a
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb b...@freebsd.org wrote:
https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100530-02.vnet.9.html
The man page should be in that perforce branch you converted to github.
Thank you for pointing that out. It is indeed in github:
On 19.11.2014 07:28, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 11/17/14, 3:02 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
(3) Take a pass through
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:07:46 +0400
Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
Can we have some wiki/man/docs on how particular subsystem should
interact with VNET first?
This can probably help to make proper vnet fixes in less number of
attempts :)
For example, even
On 19 Nov 2014, at 03:28 , Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
(6) Ask clusteradm to run one of the machines they use
for PF firewalls + IPv6 with a VIMAGE enabled kernel, and provide
feedback.
For people to use pf with VIMAGE we first MUST have the security fix imported
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote this message on Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 16:07 +0400:
Can we have some wiki/man/docs on how particular subsystem should
interact with VNET first?
Yes, we need a man page talking about this feature first, how to enable
it, compile it into the kernel, how to manage it,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Yes, we need a man page talking about this feature first, how to enable
it, compile it into the kernel, how to manage it, what subsystems it
interacts w/, what sysctl nodes it provides, etc.
Marko,
Do you have any
On 19 Nov 2014, at 23:14 , Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Yes, we need a man page talking about this feature first, how to enable
it, compile it into the kernel, how to manage it, what subsystems it
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
(4) Not everyone uses bhyve. FreeBSD jails are an excellent virtualization
platform for FreeBSD. Jails are still very popular and
performant. VIMAGE makes jails even better by allowing per-jail
network stacks.
I am using
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 11/17/14, 3:02 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
(3) Take a pass through http://wiki.freebsd.org/VIMAGE/TODO
and
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:46 AM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
PROPOSAL
==
I would like to get feedback on the following proposal.
In the head branch (CURRENT), I would like to enable
VIMAGE with this commit:
PATCH
==
Index: sys/conf/NOTES
On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:20 , Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl wrote:
I think I understand your critique, but then on the other hand I wonder
where the reluctance is As I read it, things are going to be enabled
in CURRENT only (for the time). Which is exactly for the reasons you
worry
Op 17 nov. 2014 om 16:37 heeft Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no het volgende
geschreven:
Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl writes:
The constraints as you put them are indeed rather tight. There is little
to be done about it. I was not aware of the fact that 11.0 is planned
for release in
Hi,
PROPOSAL
==
I would like to get feedback on the following proposal.
In the head branch (CURRENT), I would like to enable
VIMAGE with this commit:
PATCH
==
Index: sys/conf/NOTES
===
--- sys/conf/NOTES (revision
15 matches
Mail list logo
