Re: bhyve console question

2013-04-28 Thread Dan Mack
Yes, the current bhyve-manual has that as a step in the configuration (http://bhyve.org/bhyve-manual.txt) which I guess is the culprit. I guess I just didn't expect that side effect but admit to not spending much time thinking about it first :-) Dan On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Peter Grehan wrote

Re: bhyve console question

2013-04-28 Thread Peter Grehan
HI Dan, Yes, the current bhyve-manual has that as a step in the configuration (http://bhyve.org/bhyve-manual.txt) which I guess is the culprit. I guess I just didn't expect that side effect but admit to not spending much time thinking about it first :-) I think it was done that way since /dev

Re: bhyve console question

2013-04-28 Thread Dan Mack
Ahh, cool. I wasn't paying attention I guess: uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 at device 31.0 on pci0 uart2: console (9600,n,8,1) which maps to the bhyve argument given: '-S 31,uart,stdio' and subsequently the serial console getty on ttyu2. Nice. Thank you, It would

Re: bhyve console question

2013-04-28 Thread Peter Grehan
Hi Dan, uart2: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 at device 31.0 on pci0 uart2: console (9600,n,8,1) > which maps to the bhyve argument given: '-S 31,uart,stdio' Yes - the '-S' parameter instructs the PCI device to use a compatibility address so the console code can still access