Should also add here that for those using PF as a firewall that VIMAGE enabled
kernels don't play to well together Unless you like looking at cores all
day.
--
Jason Hellenthal
Mobile: +1 (616) 953-0176
jhellent...@dataix.net
JJH48-ARIN
On Oct 12, 2014, at 01:15, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 2014-10-12 07:28, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Should also add here that for those using PF as a firewall that VIMAGE
> enabled kernels don't play to well together Unless you like looking at
> cores all day.
>
There have been patches to address this. I know Martin m...@freebsd.org
had somet
It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later due to
stability issues we kept getting reports about. Haven't tried it since then,
dont know if those issues are fixed.
On Oct 12, 2014, 2:15 AM, at 2:15 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>... is it enabled by default on pcbsd?
>
>
>-a
Hello list,
I have a machine that runs virtualbox guests currently. I have read elsewhere
that vbox and bhyve don't play well together, but that was a while ago, and
it seemed only on some chipsets. Is this still the case?
The problem I'm having is, when trying bhyve, the installed instance boo
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Frankly speaking, it's a hard topic for me and currently I don't have a
> > complete idea how to design that. The thing I'm worried about is that as
> > far as I understand that exit codes are sort
Answered my own question - the machine froze and rebooted. Now bhyve works as
expected. Looks like it's as fast as bare metal, which is unexpected.
--
John
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Hello,
it's been a while since I tested VIMAGE, but at the last time somewhere
in 10-CURRENT some UMA memory leaks were left when destroying vnets.
They weren't showstoppers for most workloads, but pretty anoying...
Have those been fixed?
Regards,
Yamagi
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:58:13 -0700
Craig
On 12 Oct 2014, at 16:25 , Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> Hello,
> it's been a while since I tested VIMAGE, but at the last time somewhere
> in 10-CURRENT some UMA memory leaks were left when destroying vnets.
> They weren't showstoppers for most workloads, but pretty anoying...
> Have those been f
On Oct 12, 2014 9:39 AM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
wrote:
>
> No, an old perforce branch of mine had all but the last TCP ones fixed.
The code is still there.
>
Can you provide a pointer to your Perforce branch?
--
Craig
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org m
For me pf is working pretty nice on the host, it's only on the jails that it
can creates all kinds of trouble , but on the host I've not seen issues so far,
in both freebsd 9 and 10. Have not tested in current though.
On 12 October 2014 12:28:06 WEST, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
>Should also add
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-10-12 07:28, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > Should also add here that for those using PF as a firewall that VIMAGE
> enabled kernels don't play to well together Unless you like looking at
> cores all day.
> >
>
> There have been patche
On 12 Oct 2014, at 18:19 , Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2014 9:39 AM, "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
> wrote:
>>
>> No, an old perforce branch of mine had all but the last TCP ones fixed.
> The code is still there.
>>
>
> Can you provide a pointer to your Perforce branch?
//depot/user/bz/vimage/sr
I've noticed that when VIMAGE is enabled in kernel emulators/virtualbox-ose
has to have VIMAGE set as well if installed. Otherwise VirtualBox kernel
panics upon starting a VM. Other than that I've never had an issue with
it, and quite like the idea of having it out of box.
Joe Maloney
On Sun, O
On 10/12/14, 1:55 PM, wishmaster wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov"
Date: 11 October 2014, 23:20:39
On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
Are there any tests
Hi,
I have created this Jenkins job, which you can see a graphical
representation of:
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/jenkins/view/FreeBSD_src_stable/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/848/BuildGraph/
(1) does a buildworld/buildkernel on amd64 when someone checks new
code into the stable/10 branch
(2) Cr
On Oct 12, 2014, at 23:14, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created this Jenkins job, which you can see a graphical
> representation of:
>
> https://jenkins.freebsd.org/jenkins/view/FreeBSD_src_stable/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/848/BuildGraph/
…
Hi Craig!
As much as everyone would l
(does bhyve support i386?)?
Yes, and also PAE (props to jhb).
later,
Peter.
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtualizati
17 matches
Mail list logo
