Re: kern/186553: [wi] No wireless connection possible, driver not working

Synopsis: [wi] No wireless connection possible, driver not working Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-wireless Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 12 03:30:01 UTC 2014 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-p

Re: recommended usb wifi device?

On 02/11/14 09:32, Ian Smith wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:12:44 -0800, Colin Percival wrote: > > On 02/04/14 16:50, Colin Percival wrote: > > > Thanks! It turns out to be nontrivial to find devices using that > chipset given > > > its age, but I managed to find an Engenius EUB9707 on Amazon

Re: recommended usb wifi device?

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:12:44 -0800, Colin Percival wrote: > On 02/04/14 16:50, Colin Percival wrote: > > Thanks! It turns out to be nontrivial to find devices using that chipset > > given > > its age, but I managed to find an Engenius EUB9707 on Amazon. With luck > > I'll > > be able to r

Re: release or stable, for wifi

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:39:43PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:31 + > John wrote: > > > Hello list, > > > > Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The > > situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because > > it'

Re: release or stable, for wifi

Hi, On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:31 + John wrote: > Hello list, > > Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The > situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because > it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of > reliability. Wi

Re: release or stable, for wifi

I'm a big fan of -HEAD. -a On 11 February 2014 02:31, John wrote: > Hello list, > > Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The > situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because > it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of > r

release or stable, for wifi

Hello list, Is it better (for wireless) to follow 10-R, 10-STABLE or 11? The situation is an acer aspire v5 netbook. I'm running new xorg because it's an amd c70 with a radeon chipset. Thing is, it needs some kind of reliability. Wireless is provided by the ath0 driver. thanks, -- John

hostapd doesn't understand many options from provided example hostapd.conf

Hi all. ifconfig wlan0 create results in: wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether f8:1a:67:73:bf:84 inet6 fe80::fa1a:67ff:fe73:bf84%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 nd6 options=21 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng status: running