On 23 January 2015 at 12:45, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net wrote:
Here's a patch that works on my laptop's AR9565 - it just allows GPIO BIT_11
accesses. No idea why that works; I thought I discovered BIT_8 was the
rfkill bit. I tried allowing both BIT_11 /and/ BIT_8, but that
...@yahoo.com; wirel...@freebsd.org
wirel...@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working
Hm, are you buliding as a module by doing make in the module dir? or
by doing a buildkernel?
-a
On 7 January 2015 at 21:10, Anthony Jenkins
: Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com; wirel...@freebsd.org
wirel...@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working
Hm, are you buliding as a module by doing make in the module dir? or
by doing a buildkernel?
-a
On 7 January 2015 at 21
Hm, are you buliding as a module by doing make in the module dir? or
by doing a buildkernel?
-a
On 7 January 2015 at 21:10, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net wrote:
Removing just the ar9300_enable_rf_kill() bit works too, but now ath(4)
endlessly spews
ath0:
Removing just the ar9300_enable_rf_kill() bit works too, but now ath(4)
endlessly spews
ath0: ath_edma_rxfifo_alloc: Q1: alloc failed: i=3, nbufs=128?
ath0: ath_edma_rxbuf_alloc: nothing on rxbuf?!
ath0: ath_edma_rxfifo_alloc: Q1: alloc failed: i=0, nbufs=128?
ath0:
Hi Adrian,
Just letting you know I haven't died in a shootout with the US FBI or anything,
just been working on (and suprisingly fixing) issues with my HP Envy Sleekbook
6 since the holidays. I'll be cleaning up my patches and posting to the wiki
this week (hopefully). Also still sitting on
On 22 December 2014 at 14:57, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok, let me go see what's going on.
I dislike when I say let me see what's going on and then I .. see
what's going on.
So:
* the ar5212 HAL does the right thing - it checks the rfkill setup in
ar5212Reset() and enables it if
Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working
Hi!
ok, how'd you build things? a module, or in the kernel?
You need to (a) build it using 'make buildkernel / make installkernel'
and (b) ensure ATH_ENABLE_11N is in your kernel configuration.
The GPIO bits are a bit odd - let me check the other
9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working
Hi!
ok, how'd you build things? a module, or in the kernel?
You need to (a) build it using 'make buildkernel / make installkernel'
and (b) ensure ATH_ENABLE_11N is in your kernel configuration.
The GPIO bits are a bit odd - let me
?
Anthony
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working
Cool, thanks
On 22 December 2014 at 11:59, Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll have to re-add the printf()s, but I'm pretty sure I saw 0x0B (of course
it could have been 0x08 I saw, but neither of those would make it through the
function - both 0x0B and 0x08 are blocked).
Please do. I'd like
On 12/22/2014 15:22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 11:59, Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll have to re-add the printf()s, but I'm pretty sure I saw 0x0B (of course
it could have been 0x08 I saw, but neither of those would make it through
the function - both 0x0B
On 22 December 2014 at 13:59, Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 12/22/2014 15:22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 11:59, Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll have to re-add the printf()s, but I'm pretty sure I saw 0x0B (of
course it could have been 0x08 I
Oh, and ath_hal_enable_rfkill() maps to setting the capability bit:
#define ath_hal_enable_rfkill(_ah, _v) \
ath_hal_setcapability(_ah, HAL_CAP_RFSILENT, 1, _v, AH_NULL)
.. so, the AR9300 HAL code is enabling RFKILL in the HAL and then the
call to ar9300_enable_rf_kill() is unconditionally
: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
To: Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: Atheros AR9565 detected, not working
Cool, thanks.
Please make sure you post patches for all the things you fix
I just got an HP ENVY Sleekbook 6z-1100 laptop hoping it came with a
FreeBSD-supported wireless NIC. It has an Atheros AR9565 and looking at
the logs it _seems_ like it should be working, but I get no network
traffic. I haven't started the Atheros debugging procedure yet, save to
compile in
Thanks Adrian,
I've managed to fix a few things on this laptop, the remaining stuff is
BIOS/ACPI related. acpi_hp(4) isn't working, has something to do with
WMI. Hoping if I fix the ACPI stuff I can have me AR9565 working. I'll
poke around and report back; the RFKill suggestion is a good
Cool, thanks.
Please make sure you post patches for all the things you fix. I'd love
to see this kind of thing work out of the box. :)
-adrian
On 29 July 2013 07:36, Anthony Jenkins scoobi_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Adrian,
I've managed to fix a few things on this laptop, the remaining
18 matches
Mail list logo
