[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-09-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 dieterich@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-09-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #23 from dieterich@gmail.com --- (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #22) (In reply to dieterich.joh from comment #21) (In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #17) Also, please test out with the latest -HEAD and

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-09-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 Lars Engels l...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@freebsd.org

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-09-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #19 from Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org --- wlandebug +rate what happens? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-09-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #20 from Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org --- 18:55 hiren Sep 6 18:55:10 flymockour-l7 kernel: wlan0: [dc:9f:db:6a:3e:9e] AMRR: current rate 0, txcnt=11, retrycnt=14 18:55 hiren Sep 6 18:55:15 flymockour-l7 kernel: wlan0:

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-09-06 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #21 from dieterich@gmail.com --- (In reply to Adrian Chadd from comment #17) Also, please test out with the latest -HEAD and see if it behaves better for you. Just installed r271215 and can confirm that the situation is

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #15 from Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org --- The problem seems to be a lack of correct feedback to the AMRR rate control code. It doesn't get informed of the correct number of transmissions, failures and retries, leading to it

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #3 from Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org --- I did a simple iperf test where I ran client on wifi laptop and server on a machine connected to lan in my network. I am seeing 3mbps/sec average. % ifconfig wlan0 wlan0:

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #6 from Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org --- Created attachment 146235 -- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146235action=edit wifi debug 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #7 from Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org --- Created attachment 146236 -- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146236action=edit wifi debug 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #9 from Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org --- (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #6) Created attachment 146235 [details] wifi debug 1 Hm, so it drops all the way to MCS0 and then never tries a higher rate. I wonder why.

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #11 from Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org --- where exactly should I be looking for to know the rate? I see following: Aug 24 15:43:44 flymockour-l7 kernel: iwn_tx_data: qid 0 idx 2 len 56 nsegs 2 rate 0083 plcp 0x4103

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #12 from Hiren Panchasara hi...@freebsd.org --- Tried to follow the rabbit-hole to see where rate is coming from: Index: if_iwn.c === --- if_iwn.c(revision

[Bug 192950] [iwn] Centrino Advanced-N 6205 slow on 11n, better on 11g

2014-08-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192950 --- Comment #14 from Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org --- Hi, So the tx path grabs the rate from the net80211 ratectl code. The link_quality table controls which rates are tried in which order, and I think it's _after_ the rate that is