There is no "1, 6, 11" anymore. You're not listening.
Back in the day, the adjacent (1 on 6, 6 on 1, 11 on 6, 6 on 11)
channel rejection spec for 802.11b was 35dBm at 11Mbps modulation
There never was an alternate (1 on 11, 11 on 1) channel rejection spec
in the days of 802.11b.
Most decent sup
No, I get this bit. Totally. I had to deal with this with HT40
channels where .. the rejection isn't as great. Adjacent channel
interference into the secondary channel just killed things.
I'm right now more interested in making sure we can gather the data we
need first. The channel selection bit i
On 3 December 2013 19:32, Tek Wiz wrote:
> Yes, the interference can be calculated by averaging the beacon RSSI (dB) of
> the overlapping channels, e.g. for channel 6, the beacon RSSI of channels 4,
> 5, 6, 7, 8 are averaged. Normally channels 1, 6, and 11 are chosen, although
> other channels may
Yes, the interference can be calculated by averaging the beacon RSSI (dB)
of the overlapping channels, e.g. for channel 6, the beacon RSSI of
channels 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 are averaged. Normally channels 1, 6, and 11 are
chosen, although other channels may have less interference, in order to be
a 'good ne
On 3 December 2013 19:03, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Now, ideally it'd actually check the channel for interference and
>> channel busy status, and use _that_ metric.
>
> Ideally, it would attempt to get co-channel with other APs on the same
> cha
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Now, ideally it'd actually check the channel for interference and
> channel busy status, and use _that_ metric.
Ideally, it would attempt to get co-channel with other APs on the same channel.
Especially in 2.4GHz (or any of the 5GHz bands).
Be
compex wpj344
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> What model is the router?
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 3 December 2013 18:11, Tek Wiz wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > I'd be happy to work on it.
> >
> > What is the SVN URL to check out and commit?
> >
> > My router is OpenWrt compati
What model is the router?
-adrian
On 3 December 2013 18:11, Tek Wiz wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I'd be happy to work on it.
>
> What is the SVN URL to check out and commit?
>
> My router is OpenWrt compatible. Is that good enough?
>
> Yes, the metric involves interference and noise floor.
>
> Thank
Hi Adrian,
I'd be happy to work on it.
What is the SVN URL to check out and commit?
My router is OpenWrt compatible. Is that good enough?
Yes, the metric involves interference and noise floor.
Thanks for your help,
Tek Wiz
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 3 Decem
>> On 3 December 2013 17:50, Tek Wiz wrote:
>> > Hello FreeBSD Wireless,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to do a an interference scan of all the channels and
>> > manually select the channel?
Hi,
Well, if you don't assign a channel, the net80211 scan module will
scan the channels, find the channel with
In AP mode.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When operating in what mode?
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 3 December 2013 17:50, Tek Wiz wrote:
> > Hello FreeBSD Wireless,
> >
> > Is it possible to do a an interference scan of all the channels and
> > manually select the channel
Hi,
When operating in what mode?
-a
On 3 December 2013 17:50, Tek Wiz wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD Wireless,
>
> Is it possible to do a an interference scan of all the channels and
> manually select the channel?
>
> Thanks,
> Tek Wiz
> ___
> freebsd-wirel
Hello FreeBSD Wireless,
Is it possible to do a an interference scan of all the channels and
manually select the channel?
Thanks,
Tek Wiz
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscr
13 matches
Mail list logo
