[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2016-05-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 Roger Pau Monné changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h...@barafranca.com --- Comment

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2016-05-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 miguelmcl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Severity|A

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-02-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
so disabling txcsum stops the panic when I try ssh-in but I stil see the "xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1" message and it eventually times out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebs

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-02-09 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #11 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- Is the kgbd info helpful? Any extra info I can add? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-xen@freeb

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-02-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #10 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- As requested in freebsd-xen mailing list: this is from a core dumb after reboot (saved to /var/crash) KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0x8095b070 at kdb_backtrace+0x60 #1 0x8091f765

Re: [Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-01-31 Thread K. Macy
load the kernel in to gdb or kgdb and type: i li *xn_intr+0x74 to get the offending line number On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:44 AM, wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 > > --- Comment #9 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- > One thing to note is that the panic is not relat

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-01-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #9 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- One thing to note is that the panic is not related to the "mbuf already on the free list" anymore: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-01-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #8 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- PARTICULARY THIS: +/* GSO Prefix descriptor. */ +#define _NETRXF_gso_prefix (4) +#define NETRXF_gso_prefix (1U<<_NETRXF_gso_prefix) + GSO is not supported by the netbsd backend I had

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-01-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #7 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- Dunno if this will help in anyway... I lack C skills and I certainly don't know much about the Xen code... In anycase I will post my findings: I decided to compare the changes on 9 and 10, be

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #6 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- And since FreeBSD10 comes with XENHVM precompiled/loaded any freebsd10+ guest starts in a none working state! :( I should clarify that statement by saying: It start in a non working sate in reg

[Bug 188369] [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 --- Comment #5 from miguelmcl...@gmail.com --- NOTE: NetBSD just announced support for Xen 4.5. I've tested with FreeBSD 9.3 which works fine but anything 10.0+ fails with this error! And since FreeBSD10 comes with XENHVM precompiled/loade

Re: kern/188369: [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1)

2014-04-19 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1) New Synopsis: [xen] [panic] FreeBSD 10 XENHVM panic under NetBSD Dom0 (xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1) State-Changed-From-To: open->open State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 20 01

Re: xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1!

2011-05-29 Thread Hugo Silva
On 05/29/11 14:11, K. Macy wrote: > Just to verify, other guests (e.g. Linux || NetBSD) don't exhibit this > problems? It sounds almost as if xend isn't configuring the domain > properly. > Hello, I'm not sure about Linux but a NetBSD 5.1 PV domU works fine. Others are running Linux PV on NetBSD

Re: xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1!

2011-05-29 Thread K. Macy
Just to verify, other guests (e.g. Linux || NetBSD) don't exhibit this problems? It sounds almost as if xend isn't configuring the domain properly. -Kip On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Hugo Silva wrote: > On 05/25/11 17:20, Hugo Silva wrote: >> On 05/24/11 21:14, Hugo Silva wrote: >>> On 05/24/

Re: xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1!

2011-05-29 Thread Hugo Silva
On 05/25/11 17:20, Hugo Silva wrote: > On 05/24/11 21:14, Hugo Silva wrote: >> On 05/24/11 14:45, Hugo Silva wrote: >>> Trying to ssh to the VM produces the error in the subject line on the >>> FreeBSD domU; It's impossible to login. >>> >> >> Some more information for those looking to reproduce th

Re: xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1!

2011-05-25 Thread Hugo Silva
On 05/24/11 21:14, Hugo Silva wrote: > On 05/24/11 14:45, Hugo Silva wrote: >> Trying to ssh to the VM produces the error in the subject line on the >> FreeBSD domU; It's impossible to login. >> > > Some more information for those looking to reproduce this: the above is > with rxcsum and txcsum di

Re: xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1!

2011-05-24 Thread Hugo Silva
On 05/24/11 14:45, Hugo Silva wrote: > Trying to ssh to the VM produces the error in the subject line on the > FreeBSD domU; It's impossible to login. > Some more information for those looking to reproduce this: the above is with rxcsum and txcsum disabled in the xn interface: Without that, the s

xn_txeof: WARNING: response is -1!

2011-05-24 Thread Hugo Silva
Hello, NetBSD -current dom0 FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE domU. Trying to ssh to the VM produces the error in the subject line on the FreeBSD domU; It's impossible to login. I found a few references in google, but nothing conclusive. ___ freebsd-xen@freebsd.org