Hi,
On 22 Jul 2013, at 10:40, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
>> Could you also try a HEAD XENHVM kernel (without my patches), to see if
>> the issue is related to my changes or to some bug already present in HEAD?
It seems I was worrying too soon.
I have been putting the system through the wringer s
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On 22/07/13 10:40, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 Jul 2013, at 10:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> Is your guest running a 32bit or a 64bit kernel?
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD positron.dckd.nl 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
> r+a09eac7-dirty: Wed Jul 17 17:51:10 CEST 2013
> root
Hi,
On 22 Jul 2013, at 10:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Is your guest running a 32bit or a 64bit kernel?
$ uname -a
FreeBSD positron.dckd.nl 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r+a09eac7-dirty:
Wed Jul 17 17:51:10 CEST 2013
root@image01:/usr/obj/usr/home/jeroen/freebsd/sys/XENHVM amd64
>
On 22/07/13 09:18, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After some more testing I thought it would be good to put this into
> production for my personal server. I've used pvhvm_v19 and built it without
> debugging options and installed it on a FreeBSD 9.1 system.
>
> I've run into some hiccups w
Hi,
After some more testing I thought it would be good to put this into production
for my personal server. I've used pvhvm_v19 and built it without debugging
options and installed it on a FreeBSD 9.1 system.
I've run into some hiccups with 9.1 user land and a 10-CURRENT kernel, but
that's all
