On 30/11/13 11:52, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> --On 29 November 2013 18:43:32 +0100 Roger Pau Monné
> wrote:
>
>> There have been some improvements in 10 regarding timekeeping, now
>> FreeBSD makes use of the PV timer and PV clock when running under HVM,
>> which should be more stable.
>>
>> Coul
--On 29 November 2013 18:43:32 +0100 Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
There have been some improvements in 10 regarding timekeeping, now
FreeBSD makes use of the PV timer and PV clock when running under HVM,
which should be more stable.
Could you try if your issues with ntp are reproducible on 10?
On 29/11/13 16:23, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a number of FreeBSD 9.x boxes now running under XenServer 6.2
>
> Does anyone have any info / best practice / guides for what's best to
> use NTP / time sync wise?
>
> I've noticed that NTP isn't "overly happy" on some of these hosts (i
Hi,
We have a number of FreeBSD 9.x boxes now running under XenServer 6.2
Does anyone have any info / best practice / guides for what's best to use
NTP / time sync wise?
I've noticed that NTP isn't "overly happy" on some of these hosts (i.e. it
doesn't seem to settle on some, or will run fo