On 04-Oct-2013, at 9:09 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> On 04-Oct-2013, at 5:35 PM, Sergey Nasonov wrote:
>
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for suggesting the workaround.
>>>
>>> My use case is for users uploading the ISO to CloudStack private cloud and
>>> not being able to
>>> instal
On 04-Oct-2013, at 5:35 PM, Sergey Nasonov wrote:
> >Hi Sergey,
> >
> >Thank you very much for suggesting the workaround.
> >
> >My use case is for users uploading the ISO to CloudStack private cloud and
> >not being able to
> >install FreeBSD 10. As an end user of cloudstack, I don't have acces
>Hi Sergey,
>
>Thank you very much for suggesting the workaround.
>
>My use case is for users uploading the ISO to CloudStack private cloud and not
being able to
>install FreeBSD 10. As an end user of cloudstack, I don't have access to the
hypervisor (XenServer)
>to make the required param change
On 04-Oct-2013, at 1:02 PM, Sergey Nasonov wrote:
>
>
> >I just tried FreeBSD 10 ALPHA4 ISO. The ISO fails to boot on
> >XenServer 6.2 resulting with the same HyperV panic
> >
> >Regards.
> >@shankerbalan
>
> Hi,
> You can disable viridian support for that VM by command:
> xe vm-param-set pla
>I just tried FreeBSD 10 ALPHA4 ISO. The ISO fails to boot on
>XenServer 6.2 resulting with the same HyperV panic
>
>Regards.
>@shankerbalan
Hi,
You can disable viridian support for that VM by command:
xe vm-param-set platform:viridian=false uuid=
after that check platform parameter for FBSD VM
On 27-Sep-2013, at 9:59 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> (Doing a proper reply all now)
>
> On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:34 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
>> On 27/09/13 16:59, Shanker Balan wrote:
>>> Roger,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for looking into the issue.
>>>
>>> Can I have a SVN version of the pat
(Doing a proper reply all now)
On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:34 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 27/09/13 16:59, Shanker Balan wrote:
>> Roger,
>>
>> Thank you very much for looking into the issue.
>>
>> Can I have a SVN version of the patch? "patch" does not seem to like
>> the diff (or maybe I am usin
On 27/09/13 16:59, Shanker Balan wrote:
> Roger,
>
> Thank you very much for looking into the issue.
>
> Can I have a SVN version of the patch? "patch" does not seem to like
> the diff (or maybe I am using it incorrectly)
>
> root@fxen1:/usr/src # patch -n < ~/xen_hyperv.patch
> Hmm... I can't
On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:20 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 27/09/13 08:16, Shanker Balan wrote:
>> Helo,
>>
>> Now that XENHVM has been merged into the GENERIC kernel, I recompiled todays
>> -CURRENT (rev 255904)
>> and hit the following panic. It seeems to be HyperV related.
>>
>> GENERIC withou
On 27/09/13 08:16, Shanker Balan wrote:
> Helo,
>
> Now that XENHVM has been merged into the GENERIC kernel, I recompiled todays
> -CURRENT (rev 255904)
> and hit the following panic. It seeems to be HyperV related.
>
> GENERIC without "device hyperv" works properly. The hypervisor is XenServer
Helo,
Now that XENHVM has been merged into the GENERIC kernel, I recompiled todays
-CURRENT (rev 255904)
and hit the following panic. It seeems to be HyperV related.
GENERIC without "device hyperv" works properly. The hypervisor is XenServer 6.2.
# HyperV drivers
device hyperv
11 matches
Mail list logo
