On 17 January 2012 15:34, Colin Percival cperc...@freebsd.org wrote:
* ec2.patch is just tweaking some configuration files, so that doesn't
need to
be merged and isn't really a patch anyway.
There's also some new rc.d scripts which get installed and more
configuration
files; I'm not sure
On 01/17/12 13:06, Carsten Heesch wrote:
There's a folder ec2-bits in the root directory, which contains a bunch of
patches. From your blog post I gather that they will not (much longer) be
required if one was to build their own kernel?
What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory
What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the differences
between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the AMI.
Oh, must have been wishful thinking then that it might go into FreeBSD and not
remain a bunch of separate patches... :)
The csup'ed source
On 01/17/12 14:49, Carsten Heesch wrote:
What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the differences
between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the AMI.
Oh, must have been wishful thinking then that it might go into FreeBSD and
not remain a bunch of
