On 07/06/11 15:55, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On 7/5/11 10:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
>> On 07/05/11 19:42, Colin Percival wrote:
>>> Yep. Mess or not, shall I go ahead with having a loader tunable
> control this,
>>> or can you think of a better solution?
>>
>> Does anyone object to the attached p
On 7/5/11 10:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
On 07/05/11 19:42, Colin Percival wrote:
> On 07/05/11 19:04, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>> On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
>>> Maybe the right option is to have a loader tunable dev.xn.linuxback to
>>> control which version of the protocol is used?
On 07/05/11 19:42, Colin Percival wrote:
> On 07/05/11 19:04, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>> On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
>>> Maybe the right option is to have a loader tunable dev.xn.linuxback to
>>> control which version of the protocol is used?
>>
>> What a mess.
>
> Yep. Mess or not,
[oops, let's try sending this again with reply-all instead of reply...]
On 07/05/11 19:04, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
>> On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>>> On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it pos
On 7/5/11 7:14 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
>> Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it possible that there's a bug
>> in how our blkfront negotiates the request ring? Does anyone have
>> ring_pages > 1 in use?
>
On 06/10/11 13:30, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
>> Has anyone seen anything like this? Is it possible that there's a bug
>> in how our blkfront negotiates the request ring? Does anyone have
>> ring_pages > 1 in use?
>
> The only backend driver I know of that c
On 6/9/11 9:26 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeing breakage with ring_pages > 1 on a blkfront; more precisely,
request
#32 has a garbage response (resulting in a panic) exactly as if the
dom0 thinks
we're only using a single page for the ring. Forcing ring_pages to 1
makes the
Hi all,
I'm seeing breakage with ring_pages > 1 on a blkfront; more precisely, request
#32 has a garbage response (resulting in a panic) exactly as if the dom0 thinks
we're only using a single page for the ring. Forcing ring_pages to 1 makes the
problem go away.
Has anyone seen anything like thi
