Update of bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Status: Need Info => Wont Fix
Assigned to:None => cazfi
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Update of bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Planned Release:2.3.2, 2.4.0 =
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18481
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Has anybody been in contact with lua folks?
I sent email now.
The thread starts here
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2012-02/msg00244.html.
Skimming the thread, I don't see an obvious conclusion. I take it updating to
Lua 5.1.5 didn't
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
The thread starts here.
Skimming the thread, I don't see an obvious conclusion.
Basically as this is just compiler warning (turned to error only because of
-Werror) they don't consider it lua bug, and they don't want to change working
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Has anybody been in contact with lua folks?
I sent email now. Looking that clang report more carefully it seems that this
can be real bug on some (rather obscure) conditions, and not just cosmetic
build warning. restorestack() gives pointer
Update of bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Planned Release:2.3.1, 2.4.0 = 2.3.2, 2.4.0
___
Follow-up Comment #10:
This clearly isn't going to make 2.3.1, but is still desirable to fix on S2_3
for portability.
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Could you report lua compile problem directly to lua project
also? Is that problem somehow solved in system lua of your OS
(assuming it ships with one)?
Has anybody been in contact with lua folks? This really should be fixed in
upstream and
Update of bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Fixed
Assigned to:None = syntron
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Status: Fixed = Need Info
Assigned to: syntron = None
Open/Closed: Closed = Open
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
The attached patch adds a lua api check if debugging is activated. perhaps
this allows us to find the reason for the lua error ...
(file #14078)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
[12:12:ttypl][longturn@spock:~:4]$ cat a.c
#include stdio.h
int
main()
{
printf(%d %dn, sizeof(int), sizeof(size_t));
return 0;
}
[12:12:ttypl][longturn@spock:~:5]$ gcc a.c -o a ./a
4 8
Here we go, I believe this is the
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
I'm sorry, I posted to the wrong thread and didn't notice Markos answer in
bug #18482.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18481
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
It does not make the warning go away. The attached diff does, however I have
no idea what consequences it might have. I don't use LUA, I can't really test
it.
You split this bug report in two, however the following is relevant to both
of them:
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18481
Summary: lua-5.1, ldebug.c compilation failure
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wed 10 Aug 2011 11:03:58 PM EEST
Category: bootstrap
Severity: 3 - Normal
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #18481 (project freeciv):
Can you test if attached patch makes error to go away.
This is definitely not suitable patch for committing (being gcc specific) but
it can be used to determine if problem is in restorestack() cast from char *
to TValue *.
(file #13831)
15 matches
Mail list logo
