On 9/24/07, Per I. Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> (...)
> > Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag
> > things for 2.2, until then I won't be working on 2.2 either.
>
> Added. Anything else I need to to do?
>
Fi
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
> has been branched in the repository.
If you did not read the discussion, how could you reach the conclusion it
has been abandoned? The plan is still to release 2.1 soon (
On 9/24/07, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
> has been branched in the repository. I will no longer work on 2.1.
>
> Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag
> things for 2.2, un
Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
has been branched in the repository. I will no longer work on 2.1.
Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag
things for 2.2, until then I won't be working on 2.2 either.
According to http://freeci
