Update of bug #22405 (project freeciv):
Status: In Progress = Ready For Test
Planned Release: = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Fix
(file #21592,
Update of patch #4996 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #22401 (project freeciv):
Category:None = freeciv-ruledit
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22407
Summary: Assertion failure while loading classic in Freeciv
ruledit
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: sveinung
Submitted on: Wed 30 Jul 2014 11:50:40 AM UTC
Category: freeciv-ruledit
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22407 (project freeciv):
This looks like bug #22346.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22407
___
Message posté via/par Gna!
http://gna.org/
Update of bug #22407 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Duplicate
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
_This looks like bug
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #22400 (project freeciv):
New version attached. It ignores numbering. It merges the two if statements
that validated tech target.
_Your test looks a bit weak._
Correct. A new renumbering could have broken it.
_What would happen if the tech is A_LAST? Or if the tech is
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22404 (project freeciv):
IIRC, my original plan was to initialize this variable in the switch
statement. case 0 should have = instead of +=, and case 1,2,3,4 should
have it initialized. Else, there is no sense to set it explicitly for the
default case.
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?5002
Summary: Minimum libtool version 1.5.2
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wed 30 Jul 2014 07:54:04 PM EEST
Category: bootstrap
Priority: 5 - Normal
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #4759 (project freeciv):
As the version this development branch leads to is not freeciv-2.7 but
freeciv-3.0, version number could be 2.99.0 or 2.99.99 (I prefer former, but
need to check if our code assumes development version micro to be 99)
instead of 2.6.99.
-
Update of bug #22398 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #22399 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Update of bug #22378 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #22404 (project freeciv):
I see at least three ways one could argue to be the right way to do this. I
don't have strong opinion about this. Do you want to implement the patch some
certain way? If my original patch is to be used, it should be changed at least
to
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #22273 (project freeciv):
My fellow developers, I'm afraid I need your help again. I am trying to add a
field for setting the unit's activity at the client level. I have code that
checks a given activity value and then attempts to update the object. As far
as I can
Update of bug #22330 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Ready For Test
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Planned Release: = 2.5.0, 2.6.0
Update of bug #22216 (project freeciv):
Assigned to: cazfi = pepeto
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?22216
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #4759 (project freeciv):
I like 2.99.99 : it makes the next step obvious to readers.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?4759
___
Message sent
URL:
http://gna.org/patch/?5003
Summary: Requirers dialog
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Thu 31 Jul 2014 04:24:50 AM EEST
Category: freeciv-ruledit
Priority: 5 - Normal
19 matches
Mail list logo