Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39811) BUG: oddball iterators
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39811 Since TRUNK and S2_2 AI is very much broken, I tested this with S2_1 (patch applied cleanly except one line change in unitlist.h) There seems to be some regression. Autogames differ. - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39811) BUG: oddball iterators
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39811 Marko Lindqvist wrote: There seems to be some regression. Autogames differ. A regression is the return of a previously reported and fixed bug. What bug are you reporting has returned? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] (PR#39811) BUG: oddball iterators
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39811 Come to think of it, I hadn't been applying these iterator patches against 2.1. They were trunk-only (nee 2.2). It's kinda nice to hear that they apply cleanly, but wasn't my expectation. They were written for 2.2. When I was testing 2.1 six months ago, I was never able to replicate two 2.1 games. I did manage to get some of the random variables saved in 2.1, although more is done in 2.2/trunk. I'll try adding these patches to 2.1 one at a time, and see which one changes the output I didn't expect that any output would change! Still, you haven't reported an actual bug. ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
