[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3471] Set S2_4 beta bit on before actual beta1 release

[Jacob Nevins]

Update of patch #3471 (project freeciv):

  Status:  Ready For Test = Done   
 Open/Closed:Open = Closed 


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?3471

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3471] Set S2_4 beta bit on before actual beta1 release

[Jacob Nevins]

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #3471 (project freeciv):

Could do. I was just reviewing this sort of thing in the run up to beta1.

(I just tried a beta build locally and it compiles and appears to run :)

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?3471

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3471] Set S2_4 beta bit on before actual beta1 release

[Marko Lindqvist]

URL:
  http://gna.org/patch/?3471

 Summary: Set S2_4 beta bit on before actual beta1 release
 Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Wed 01 Aug 2012 06:37:57 AM EEST
Category: general
Priority: 5 - Normal
  Status: None
 Privacy: Public
 Assigned to: None
Originator Email: 
 Open/Closed: Open
 Discussion Lock: Any
 Planned Release: 2.4.0-beta1

___

Details:

Would it make sense to switch IS_BETA_VERSION 'on' (and IS_DEVEL_VERSION
'off') in S2_4 already, with version number being something like -beta0 or
just to remain -alpha, so beta-style builds would be somewhat tested before
first actual beta release?

I don't think we've ever done that, and there has been no problems (but one
close call when it occurred to me to locally test beta build just before
release to find out that it didn't compile).




___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/patch/?3471

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev