2008/6/6 Daniel Markstedt:
> On 6/5/08, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>> 2008/5/26 Daniel Markstedt:
>>
>> > One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8.
>>
>> Freeciv doesn't compile with current gcc 4.3 branch, and 4.3.1 will
>> be released any day now.
>>
>
> Is this reason enough to postpone
On 6/6/08, Marko Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Daniel Markstedt:
>
> > On 6/5/08, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> >> 2008/5/26 Daniel Markstedt:
> >>
> >> > One week later it is; Targeted release date June 8.
> >>
> >> Freeciv doesn't compile with current gcc 4.3 branch, and 4.3.1
2008/6/6 Madeline Book:
> What might be nice is to release 2.1.5 so it can be used
> for the first 2.1.x longturn game (which will probably start in a week or
> two),
Then I suggest that we postpone 2.1.5 one week, if that's possible
for Daniel. I should have time for looking into the gcc 4.3 pr
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40258 >
I heard a rumor that freeciv (S2_1) didn't compile with gcc 4.3. So I
installed it and tried it. I found only one error in the default
compilation, fixed by this simple patch. This surely applies to 2.2 and
trunk as well.
-jason
Index
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40258 >
Jason Dorje Short wrote:
> http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40258 >
>
> I heard a rumor that freeciv (S2_1) didn't compile with gcc 4.3. So I
> installed it and tried it. I found only one error in the default
> compilation,
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40259 >
==14996== 404,976 bytes in 386 blocks are possibly lost in loss record
175 of 179
==14996==at 0x4021A92: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:460)
==14996==by 0x4021B3F: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:569)
==14996==by 0x45CBCE3: (w
