URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40592
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Madeline Book wrote:
Anyway, my point is that assuming implementing multiple auth
backends would not turn the auth code into a sprawling
unmaintainable mess, since nobody is actively working
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40592
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:57:51AM -0800, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
GGZ provides all the same features as auth with multiple backends
support. I'd see improving the GGZ support as a better alternative than
working on auth.
Thanks,
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40592
[sch...@debian.org - Wed Dec 10 22:50:45 2008]:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:57:51AM -0800, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
GGZ provides all the same features as auth with multiple backends
support. I'd see improving the GGZ support as
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40592
2008/12/11 Madeline Book madeline.b...@gmail.com:
I would rather that if you have the time and would not mind
having your work possibly superseded at some unknown later
time when ggz has matured, to submit your proposed auth
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40592
auth support is tied to mysql, rather than a generic interface which
could support another backend, such as sqlite or postgres.
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40592
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 09 00:24:30 2008]:
auth support is tied to mysql, rather than a generic interface which
could support another backend, such as sqlite or postgres.
Yes, I agree, though this would be some work to cleanup
