[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Update of patch #5006 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Done Assigned to:None => cazfi Open/Closed:Open => Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Follow-up Comment #6, patch #5006 (project freeciv): - S2_5 version (file #23742) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: HelpUnitSpecificIsPossible-S2_5.patch Size:7 KB ___ Rep

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Update of patch #5006 (project freeciv): Status:None => Ready For Test Planned Release:2.5.0, 2.6.0 => 2.5.0, 2.6.0, 3.0.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #5: Patch to complete

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Update of patch #5006 (project freeciv): Depends on: => patch #5796 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sen

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Update of patch #5006 (project freeciv): Depends on: => patch #5783 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sen

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Follow-up Comment #4, patch #5006 (project freeciv): > the shape of a solution for S2_5, but nothing firm yet (I'm not > yet convinced we want to backport > universal_fulfills_requirement(), although that's an easy way to > solve the problem). We seem to be missing many tools that would be very h

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Update of patch #5006 (project freeciv): Depends on: => patch #5774 ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sen

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Follow-up Comment #3, patch #5006 (project freeciv): I've no immediate plans to work on this; feel free to take it. > I'd really rather do this without introducing nreqs anywhere When I say "nreqs" I'm being lazy; really I mean present=FALSE requirements for trunk. __

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Follow-up Comment #2, patch #5006 (project freeciv): > Removing fallout/pollution probably needs more effort (this > doesn't have a requirements_vector). Yes it has; "rmreqs" ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #5006 (project freeciv): For trunk, using requirement_fulfilled_by_unit() and extension of the relevant requirements vectors can address irrigation, mining, farmland, and road/rail (can this unit mine? If so, can it produce any of the EC_MINE extras?, etc.). Removing

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #5006] Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc

URL: Summary: Suppress "Can build mines on tiles" etc in help based on Mining_Possible, etc Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Fri 01 Aug 2014 12:52:30 BST Category: docs