Re: [Freedombox-discuss] A project to co-operate with?

Den 18 jul 2016 09:54 skrev "Matthias Weiler" : > > On 2016-07-17 23:03, Sandy Harris wrote: >> >> https://github.com/Librerouter >> >> Part of their librerouter project is librekernel": >> >> Sounds to me like something the FB project should adopt. > > If they use

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Fwd: Samba on Freedombox

Hello 2015-11-30 20:17 GMT+01:00 Marc Jones : > Tim, > > You can access files hosted on your freedombox using Owncloud or SFTP. > The way to go. > Or least that is the primary way I have heard people talking about > getting files on and off the box. If you want to

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Quick report from GETD

Hello. Den 5 apr 2015 17:09 skrev Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com: On 5 April 2015 at 15:58, Markus Sabadello mar...@projectdanube.org wrote: Am 4/5/2015 um 2:36 AM schrieb Melvin Carvalho: One thing I have not worked out for freedombox is how to connect my storage to the web e.g.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Raspberry Pi 2

2015-02-04 15:48 GMT+01:00 Sunil Mohan Adapa su...@medhas.org: On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:47 PM, Felix Oxley wrote: Is it possible that the Raspberry Pi 2 is or could become an/the ideal platform fro FreedomBox? :-) Despite its shortcomings, it would be nice to have support for this

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Raspberry Pi 2

and UEFI in many PC, also not open freeware. So, make arguments, but not FUD... /Jackson. ljones On 2/4/15, Anders Jackson anders.jack...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-02-04 15:48 GMT+01:00 Sunil Mohan Adapa su...@medhas.org: On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:47 PM, Felix Oxley wrote

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Raspberry Pi 2

2015-02-03 19:23 GMT+01:00 Blibbet blib...@gmail.com: Is it possible that the Raspberry Pi 2 is or could become an/the ideal platform fro FreedomBox? If it runs Windows, it probably has UEFI and TrustZone on it. No, it doesn't. The firmware have the same boot behaviour as previous RPi models.

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] x86 instalation

on hardware that are not x86 based, but you are welcome to run it on x86 specific hardware. This is because if the development are done on x86 specific hardware, it is to easy to add x86 specific sollutions which doesn't work or scale to other architectures. Yours Anders Jackson

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Switch to btrfs on the Freedombox?

Nice. 2014-11-08 20:43 GMT+01:00 Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com: [Sunil Mohan Adapa] It would be nice to switch to Btrfs. Consider it done, at least as a test. I've pushed changes to freedom-maker on alioth to create images using btrfs as the default file system. Please test it and

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Merge Policy?

2014-11-06 20:17 GMT+01:00 Bob Girard bgir...@esedona.net: On 11/05/2014 05:31 PM, Nick Daly wrote: Hi folks, I've recently had a few questions about the FBX community's merge policy, and wanted to bring them to the list, because it might be helpful to have a well documented standard

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Setup Questions

Den 23 apr 2014 18:09 skrev Chris Troutner chris.trout...@gmail.com: Hey all, I stumbled a bit when trying to setup my freedom box. I'm hoping the collective knowledge in this group can help me recover. Additional notes on the questions below are posted on my running Freedombox blog:

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How do we handle package upgrades on the Freedombox?

Jag Den 17 apr 2014 11:25 skrev Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2014-04-17 08:20:22) [James Valleroy] I think we can use dpkg-reconfigure without the interactive frontend: echo jwchat jwchat/ApacheServerName string $hostname | debconf-set-selections

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How do we handle package upgrades on the Freedombox?

2014-04-17 14:19 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Anders Jackson (2014-04-17 13:14:56) Den 17 apr 2014 11:25 skrev Jonas Smedegaard [1]d...@jones.dk: Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2014-04-17 08:20:22) If that work, jwchat is broken, [snip] Ahh, now I realize what your point

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] OwnCloud

different public IPv6 addresses for each virtual web service, if wanted. That would make firewall setup easier. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen Great work. Time to install FreedomBox in a virtual web server and stop guessing, wouldn't it? ;-) Anders Jackson

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How to use JWChat on the freedombox?

Den 20 mar 2014 08:53 skrev alberto fuentes paj...@gmail.com: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: [Alberto Fuentes] echo fb ip fbx /etc/hosts then navigate to fbx You are right. This actually work. When I visit

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Avahi (was: Re: How to use JWChat on the freedombox?)

Den 18 mar 2014 19:32 skrev Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk: On 17 Mar 2014 22:06, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: [Alberto Fuentes] echo fb ip fbx /etc/hosts then navigate to fbx You are right. This actually work. When I visit http://eth0-ip-on-freedombox/, I get

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Block brute force login attacks?

Den 18 mar 2014 13:46 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com: Hi. Hello On all my machines, I install denyhosts with a two hour timeout (DAEMON_PURGE = 2h), to block those trying to brute force a ssh login. Should we do something similar on the Freedombox? This can be done directly by

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Block brute force login attacks?

Den 18 mar 2014 22:18 skrev Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com: [Anders Jackson] This can be done directly by iptables, (but not yet with iptables6 for ip6tables ). So I would suggest using a firewall utility instead, like ufw or shorewall. This sound interesting. How can iptables

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Hosting public services (was: Re: Bootstrapping a Freedombox contact list)

2013/11/29 Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org: On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 02:14 +0100, Anders Jackson wrote: Of course it does, but the communication between the devices are encrypted, so Tor, or something like that, on top of IPsec on IPv6 will give you both secrecy and anonymity. Yes; the point

[Freedombox-discuss] Fwd: Re: Dev: Networking Interface Config?

-- Vidarebefordrat meddelande -- Från: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com [Nick Daly] Hi folks, I'm trying to fix the /etc/network/interface misconfiguration in the Freedom-Maker generated images, but I'm not sure where best to apply the fix. The underlying issue is that

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Hosting public services (was: Re: Bootstrapping a Freedombox contact list)

Den 27 nov 2013 23:51 skrev Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org: On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:23 +0100, Anders Jackson wrote: Sorry, my fault. I was thinking of IPSec, http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPsec I think IPv6 will eventually mean that everyone has static IP addresses at home

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Hosting public services (was: Re: Bootstrapping a Freedombox contact list)

Den 27 nov 2013 00:27 skrev Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org: Can you point to SecureIP for me? I'm struggling to search for it. Sorry, my fault. I was thinking of IPSec, http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPsec I think IPv6 will eventually mean that everyone has static IP addresses at home, but

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Hosting public services (was: Re: Bootstrapping a Freedombox contact list)

Den 26 nov 2013 09:19 skrev Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org: On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 23:57 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Tim Retout] Future extensions: == [...] - How would services on public IPs be offered? (UPnP to punch through the router, and then

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Dev: Current Plinth Bugs

Den 25 nov 2013 14:46 skrev Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Hi Anders, NB! Please don't cc me. Ops, sorry. Quoting Anders Jackson (2013-11-25 12:48:22) Den 25 nov 2013 12:00 skrev Jonas Smedegaard [1]d...@jones.dk: Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2013-11-25 11:34:32) [Jonas Smedegaard

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Dev: Current Plinth Bugs

Den 26 nov 2013 11:53 skrev Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Anders Jackson (2013-11-26 11:09:51) Den 25 nov 2013 14:46 skrev Jonas Smedegaard [1]d...@jones.dk: Quoting Anders Jackson (2013-11-25 12:48:22) Den 25 nov 2013 12:00 skrev Jonas Smedegaard [1][2]d...@jones.dk: Quoting

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Dev: Current Plinth Bugs

Den 25 nov 2013 12:00 skrev Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2013-11-25 11:34:32) [Jonas Smedegaard] I suggest to use either Postgres or SQLite backend, instead of MySQL: Both of those support password-less access. There are infrastructure in Debian for

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Dev: Current Plinth Bugs

Den 25 nov 2013 12:00 skrev Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2013-11-25 11:34:32) [Jonas Smedegaard] I suggest to use either Postgres or SQLite backend, instead of MySQL: Both of those support password-less access. There are infrastructure in Debian for

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How to make a freedombox on non-public network available on the Internet

Just read Debian Wiki about IPv6[1] to see how to set up IPv6 tunneling. What you need depends a bit of how you want to set up the net. Do you want to provide IPv6 to your LAN or not. All firewalls support IPv6 now, what I know, or just use ip6tables. I have used ufw and shorewall for this and

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] How to make a freedombox on non-public network available on the Internet

Den 1 nov 2013 11:50 skrev Hamish Cunningham ham...@gate.ac.uk: I think you mean pagekite -- and it's great! and already packaged for debian, where it installs and runs perfectly in my experience (on a Raspberry Pi) the author of pagekite also shares many FreedomBox goals, I believe so +1

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Which mesh system should be included in the Freedombox?

Den 12 okt 2013 11:54 skrev Paul Gardner-Stephen p...@servalproject.org: Hello all, Hello Paul. On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: [Sandy Harris] As I see it, security has to be the first consideration for any Box component, including a mesh

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Add Raspberry Pi as a reference platform?

Hello. Den 10 okt 2013 13:33 skrev Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:06:14PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: The point I am trying to make is that we should focus on hardware available already with a lot of users. The fact that there is other The Raspberry is a

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox CA

Interesting. Den 12 sep 2013 15:09 skrev Keith ke...@fernie.eu: After further thought: With a CA on each freedombox we could have something like this Create a CA using (options used could be changed) openssl genrsa -des3 -out Freedombox CA.key 4096 openssl req -new -x509 -days 3650 -key

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] public + private http services

Den 15 jul 2013 14:55 skrev Nick Daly nick.m.d...@gmail.com: Quoting Timur Mehrvarz (2013-07-15 07:05:29) Hi, is there an agreed upon best practice on how to separate public http services from those that shall only be accessible on the private network? Private only services could be

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox/Unhosted/PageKite for Access Innovation Prize 2012

Michiel de JongT, ue Jul 10 08:18:06 UTC 2012 Hi Anders, Hi Michiel. In an ideal world, yes, but in order for the freedombox to be useful for mainstream users, we have to be compatible with the current situation of the world outside, which (still) involves IPv4, DNS, browsers' white lists

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox/Unhosted/PageKite for Access Innovation Prize 2012

Eugen Leitl Tue Jul 10 10:21:01 UTC 2012 On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:54:01AM +0200, Anders Jackson wrote: And about certificates, there are not only StartSSL (https://stratssk.com), which is good but we also have have CAcert (https://CAcert.org/) which should be a good infrastructure

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox/Unhosted/PageKite for Access Innovation Prize 2012

I can't understand why som many are so locked into one public IP address per home, when we at least can have 2^64 different addresses if we uses IPv6. And with some sertificates we can even encrypt communication between sites. We also doesn't need to handle NAT (in any other way but to get out

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] What Do You want to use the FreedomBox for?

- p2p backup on other FreedomBoxes Would be not to hard built upon git-annex, as Elena ``of Valhalla'' mentioned. I can be set up so that each file is stored in more than one place, and synced when needed. Jabber would also be a good infrastructure to build upon. It's designed to do a lot more

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Environmental range of the dream plug

What is the actually problem with the hardware and FB? IF you have need for specifications that isn't what DP 2 can provide, buy/use something else. Just because the example hardware is DP 2, you can still use any hardware you like that fullfill the minimal specs. Yes, I'm possitive that there