I don't think we should start trimming features just because we think
heavy usage might be too much for the hardware. If we make a per-user
solution now, it doesn't really add overhead for single user cases
that we can use now on dreamplug servers, and it would be really
useful to have good
My experience with the dreamplug/ et all devices and having multiple power
users is not great. I really don't believe they are powerful enough to
hold multiple virtual hosts (would love to be proved wrong)
It was fine for lightweight use but as soon as any kind of heavy IO
activity kicked in
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Nick M. Daly wrote:
Bryan, thanks for sending this along. I don't have any answers, but
these are pretty fundamental questions.
Thanks for the reply!
Does anybody else have any guidance or insight? This is more than I want
to bite off on my own. In case this thread
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:16:32 -0400 (EDT), bnewb...@robocracy.org wrote:
General purpose Configuration Management seems to be a crucial component
of the FreedomBox software stack/distribution. It needs to be secure,
accessible (elegant user experience for diverse userbase), reliable,
