Thanks, that was successful.
However, I had to restart the box to have unattended-upgrades run again.
Dis- and en-abling was not sufficient.
Dietmar
Am Donnerstag, den 22.09.2016, 17:34 -0400 schrieb James Valleroy:
> On 09/22/2016 02:26 PM, Dietmar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I realized, my last
I haven't much help to offer about possible APT database trouble, except:
On 09/22/2016 02:26 PM, Dietmar wrote:
> meaning "unfullfilled dependencies, try "-f".
> Before breaking my packages, is it save to use "force"?
In apt-get, "-f" is short for "--fix-broken".
HTH,
Daniel
signature.asc
D
On 09/22/2016 02:26 PM, Dietmar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I realized, my last unattended upgrade was on 8-Sept. So I went via
> ssh into the box and tried aptitude which recommended me to do a "sudo
> dpkg --configure -a", which brought up an error:
>
>> $ sudo dpkg --configure -a
>> libapt-inst2.0:armhf (1
On 06/29/2016 09:06 PM, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 08:59 PM, A. F. Cano wrote:
>> I have noticed that if privoxy is enabled, when doing an apt download from
>> internal machines, if it fails, aptitude retries but starts at the
>> beginning again.
>
> My Google-fu suggests that Privox
On 07/02/2016 09:42 PM, A. F. Cano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:36:22AM -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote:
>> On 06/28/2016 08:59 PM, A. F. Cano wrote:
>>> I have noticed that if privoxy is enabled, when doing an apt download from
>>> internal machines, if it fails, aptitude retries but starts
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:36:22AM -0400, Daniel Gnoutcheff wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 08:59 PM, A. F. Cano wrote:
> > I have noticed that if privoxy is enabled, when doing an apt download from
> > internal machines, if it fails, aptitude retries but starts at the
> > beginning again.
>
> My Google-fu
On 06/28/2016 08:59 PM, A. F. Cano wrote:
> I have noticed that if privoxy is enabled, when doing an apt download from
> internal machines, if it fails, aptitude retries but starts at the
> beginning again.
My Google-fu suggests that Privoxy filters out the "Range" HTTP request
header field by def
Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2016, 18:28 -0400 schrieb James Valleroy:
> On 05/12/2016 03:07 PM, Dietmar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did yesterday an 'apt upgrade' (my impression is that
> > unattended-upgrades are not working, but no proof yet, no error
> > messages in the log).
> > The result was that
On 05/12/2016 03:07 PM, Dietmar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did yesterday an 'apt upgrade' (my impression is that
> unattended-upgrades are not working, but no proof yet, no error
> messages in the log).
> The result was that I had a new network interface 'eth0' again, which
> was activated, additionally to
On 08/26/2015 03:51 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
>> I send the blog author a proposal to create a new apt transport method
>> in /usr/lib/apt/methods/ to make it easier to ensure transport via Tor,
>> but I have not tested it myself.
>
> Today a new blog post showed up,
>
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> I send the blog author a proposal to create a new apt transport method
> in /usr/lib/apt/methods/ to make it easier to ensure transport via Tor,
> but I have not tested it myself.
Today a new blog post showed up,
http://richardhartmann.de/blog/posts/2015/08/25-Tor-enabled_D
Quoting bnewb...@robocracy.org (2012-12-04 21:17:31)
> On the subject of restructuring freedom-maker, what about using Debian
> Live instead? "Normal" (non-live) images can be generated, and it's a
> more general purpose (and supported) debian tool.
>
> I have a working-but-not-documented wheezy
bnewb...@robocracy.org writes:
> I have a working-but-not-documented wheezy image for the DreamPlug
> generated using Debian Live if there is interest, but will be AFK for the
> next week.
Feel free to pass me the details when you return. My impression the
last time I looked was that the Live
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012, Bdale Garbee wrote:
JOSEFSSON Erik writes:
Just a very general question: What does it take (in detailed steps) to
get from where fbx is today to apt-get install fbx?
I'm working on it. The short answer is creating a suitable metapackage
or three and then restructuring
JOSEFSSON Erik writes:
> Just a very general question: What does it take (in detailed steps) to
> get from where fbx is today to apt-get install fbx?
I'm working on it. The short answer is creating a suitable metapackage
or three and then restructuring freedom-maker to use it/them.
Bdale
pg
Quoting Jonathan Wilkes (2012-11-20 21:13:12)
> It's nice to see a plan of basic infrastructure work and example
> scripts up to 0.4.0, but that's a mysterious and large jump to 1.0.0
> when you project FBX will be "usable by non-technical users".
>
> Regardless of time frame, I predict when som
s Smedegaard
> To: freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] apt-get install fbx
>
> Quoting JOSEFSSON Erik (2012-11-14 18:55:19)
>> Just a very general question: What does it take (in detailed ste
Quoting JOSEFSSON Erik (2012-11-14 18:55:19)
> Just a very general question: What does it take (in detailed steps) to
> get from where fbx is today to apt-get install fbx?
FreedomBox (arguably) exist today in version 0.1 (and some additional
progress beyond that), but not in a long-term maintain
On 06/28/2012 05:07 PM, monkeyiq wrote:
> Probably starting with the uboot upgrade and
> then trying a few kernel updates on the non live plug system.
Once upgrading uboot to boot from ext file systems it is possible to
just format the microsd card as a single ext partition and boot from
that. I h
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 11:35 -0400, Ian Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/27/2012 10:22 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote:
> > If you're using the uBoot that came with the DreamPlug, kernel upgrades
> > or boot process changes will probably give you trouble. If you're using
> > the upgraded uBoot [0], everything should
On 06/27/2012 10:22 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote:
> If you're using the uBoot that came with the DreamPlug, kernel upgrades
> or boot process changes will probably give you trouble. If you're using
> the upgraded uBoot [0], everything should be fine. Ian might recall
> details I've forgotten, though.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:40:44 +1000, monkeyiq wrote:
> Sorry about the FAQ, but if one has installed FreedomBox on an sdcard
> in a Dreamplug is there any special procedure needed to update the
> kernel or does the normal apt-get update command take care of all of
> that sort of thing for you?
If
Honestly - I found that apt-get upgrade on my dreamplug has more than once
bricked it. Annoying to say the least. BUT - I wasn't using the freedom
box image at that point. I tend to avoid updating anything now unless
specifically called for by an update/ config requirement. And then I do it
wit
On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:52:32 +0100, Nicholas Hardiman wrote:
> When I run apt-get upgrade, the top command tells me wa (time spent
> waiting for SD card IO) can sit at 95%. SD cards seem to have
> appalling write speeds.
Yup.
> Are you using any trick to make big write jobs less awful?
Some card
24 matches
Mail list logo
