Hi folks,
I could do with advice and hints on
internationalisation, to make sure I do it correctly.
HTML Help has no international support at present, and
I was planning to tackle this next. And now I have had
an enquiry into creating a German translation, so I
now really want to get a move on.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:39:23 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
I agree. But I'm also sure that we'll live to see it! Our century will be
the century of the downfall of empires... ;-G
Look forward to see.
I'm trying to run network on FreeDOS, but resources are scattered.
Also sorry to see ARACHNE
This proves nothing:
- you is liar?
- no.
OK, King of logic! ;) My logic is wrong but my assertion is right as
you'll see. Qui prodest?
the century of the downfall of empires... ;-G
Oh, Lucho, please, make less general purpose loud sentences.
OK. More specifically, the first empire to fall will
Help is often run when the user is having problems
setting up FreeDOS. Their codepage could be incorrect.
Help should be robust in such circumstances. It would
be great if I could detect the codepage, rather than
assume it. Is there a DOS interrupt or something that
could do this?
Kitten: as I
Hi!
22--2004 17:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Platt) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RP Help is often run when the user is having problems setting up FreeDOS.
RP Their codepage could be incorrect. Help should be robust in such
RP circumstances. It would be great if I could detect the codepage, rather
Hi,
Robert Platt escribió:
Help is often run when the user is having problems
setting up FreeDOS. Their codepage could be incorrect.
Help should be robust in such circumstances. It would
be great if I could detect the codepage, rather than
assume it. Is there a DOS interrupt or something that
An addition...
Robert Platt escribió:
Is there somewhere I can find an ASCII character map
for each code page? It would save Eric the ordeal of
sending me a transcription ;-)
If you can't map in general codepage to codepage, it's almost impossible
to have a decent mapping from codepage (8bit,
ASM But anyway, and in order to avoid discrepancies, I'd like to use UPX/UCL
ASM if available
Seems GPL forces you to use second best choice
(similar to choosing LINUX)
However, after rereading the *exact* GPL terms, I still consider an
exepacker kind of runtime library.
IFF
it's ok to
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
I'd like to ask if someone has successfully compiled UPX/UCL.
yes, but only on Linux.
of those that I have corrected where due to things such as using
SYSLIMITS.H not being present (it was SYSLIMIT.H, I guess that to follow
DOS 8.3
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, tom ehlert wrote:
ASM But anyway, and in order to avoid discrepancies, I'd like to use UPX/UCL
ASM if available
Seems GPL forces you to use second best choice
(similar to choosing LINUX)
Hmm. What's the best choice then? Solaris? FreeBSD? FreeDOS? For whom? :)
But then
Hi!
With help of Michael Devore, on his site placed version 1.4 of BOOTFIX.
This version is now compilable both by Borland C and OpenWatcom. It shows
slightly more information (to ease using logs even without dumps), before
reading BPB added reseting disk (look like this is sometime required
Hi tom,
IFF
it's ok to compile a GPL program with any compiler of your choice,
and distribute it,
The problem is not the compiler but the library. On clear example is (in
Linux) if you use GCC/GPP you can make a comercial program, but you
cannot include it's _library_ because it's GPL. In
Hola Aitor!
I'd like to ask if someone has successfully compiled UPX/UCL.
I did this last year with DJGPP 3.02, and could try UPX 1.91 with DJGPP
3.33, but I don't think it's worth! See my post at
http://upx.sourceforge.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=255 (quoted below).
Lucho
Posted: Wed May 14,
13 matches
Mail list logo
