Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads, yes downloads, are emm386.zip
(executable) and emm386sr.zip (source) fixing two minor problems with the official Tom
Ehlert release of EMM386. The files are dated April 20, 2004.
This version of EMM386 supports EMS 4.0 function 58h, so that
At 02:06 PM 4/21/2004 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
Also another application call BLASTER MASTER (Sound editor) also said
EMS Corrupt, I've asked the author, it become free now. I can email
or upload to your FTP if you want.
I grabbed Blaster Master off the web. Turns out that for it to run under
Hi, is FDPM still alive or did it get replaced by the
GUI and text mode installers which were used in beta 9.4 and 9.5?
http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
asks for package management in the installer, and I think at
least the GUI installer can be described as having such a
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi, is FDPM still alive or did it get replaced by the
GUI and text mode installers which were used in beta 9.4 and 9.5?
http://www.freedos.org/bugs/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
asks for package management in the installer, and I think at
least the GUI installer can be described as
Blaauw,Bernd B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(are you using UNDI driver btw for PXE, instead of DOS network drivers?)
I am using 3com's universal NDIS-over-UNDI driver. But I am not even
getting that far...
could you leave everything identical on the bootdisk but use a MSDOS
kernel on that
Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Pat, your patches and/or MEMDISK have the problem that they do
not DETECT which A20 setting styles work and which not!
- PS/2: port 92h - or 2 to enable, and ~2 to disable A20
- 8042: command d1 / port 60 ... here, too, ONLY bit 1 should be messed
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
I believe I have solved my own problem.
(I am CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] for complete archives, but please
direct additional followups to freedos-devel since this is definitely
not a SYSLINUX problem.)
This patch uses the BIOS (INT15/AX=2400 and 2401) interface
Hi, if HIMEM64 crashes but FDXXMS PS does not, try the new
/VERBOSE and /METHOD:... command line options of HIMEM/HIMEM64
to find out which of the A20 methods cause the troubles.
When exactly does the crash happen, did you try F8 single step
mode and combinations of DOS={HIGH,LOW},{UMB,NOUMB}
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:36:40 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Michael,
Absolutely different. You seem to have one of the previously-theoretical machines we
were discussing as potential a problem: a PC that has an entry condition of A20 on,
but allows it to be turned off.
Seems this is the only one I
At 06:06 PM 4/21/2004 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi, if HIMEM64 crashes but FDXXMS PS does not, try the new
/VERBOSE and /METHOD:... command line options of HIMEM/HIMEM64
to find out which of the A20 methods cause the troubles.
You're replying to a glop of mail that was either held or retransmitted
At 01:10 PM 4/21/2004 +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Michael Devore wrote:
At 02:06 PM 4/21/2004 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
Also another application call BLASTER MASTER (Sound editor) also said
EMS Corrupt, I've asked the author, it become free now. I can email
or upload to
The problem with HIMEM and XMSDSK running under a 2G machine has been resolved.
XMSDSK uses 1 XMS handler per 64M memory allocated. When there are no more XMS
handles, XMSDSK seems to fail checking for a return error code, leading to a crashed
PC. This appears to be a design flaw in XMSDSK.
Hi!
21--2004 00:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BO The present patches are just intermediate stages to get closer -- maybe
Ask again: please, remind me, ke2034_16 - is a _8086_ kernel with FAT32
or a 8086 kernel with _FAT16_? On site this is not explained.
Even at 4G max, the number of handles XMSDSK could need is 64, plus
the HIMEM overhead for itself and EMM386 of 2 or 3. Accordingly, I am
probably going to increase the default setting of HIMEM XMS handles to
72.
I would welcome 72 for default as you may anticipate from our
discussions on
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Eric Auer wrote:
2034_16 and 2034_32 are both 8086 kernels.
2034_16 supports FAT12 and FAT16
2034_32 supports FAT12, FAT16 and FAT32
yes, it's here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=231835
also if you run the kernel it will say so in the beginning
I have a system which is currently running Win98. I am considering upgrading
to FreeDOS if I can get
a CD burner. (I can say 'upgrading' with a perfectly straight face, because
I have had enough head-
aches from Winblows to make me seriously consider this option). I have a few
questions:
16 matches
Mail list logo
