Hi!
I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG: application PSP
inside FD-DEBUG have as parent debug's PSP, which have as parent itself (ie.
it makes itself primary shell, which shouldn't be terminated by INT21/4C).
App PSP inside MS-DEBUG have as parent the PSP, which is parent
Hi,
Good effort!
I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG: application
PSP
inside FD-DEBUG have as parent debug's PSP, which have as parent itself
(ie.
it makes itself primary shell, which shouldn't be terminated by
INT21/4C).
App PSP inside MS-DEBUG have as parent the PSP,
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
2Steffen Kaiser: Steffen, how FreeCOM handles /E option? I mean, how
this options affects environment? Is it _limits_ size of internal buffer,
It resizes the block of memory the environment of FreeCOM resides in.
which later used to make environment of new
Hi!
26--2004 16:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
F FreeCOM does not use no internal buffer for the environment, but
F performs all operations on the environment segment.
Ie. applications always get reduced (to size of contents) envrionment
memory block
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:42:14PM +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG:
Thank you very much for the additional information. However, there's one
bit of information missing. I assume that your analysis was all done doing
things such
Hi!
26--2004 20:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ie. applications always get reduced (to size of contents) envrionment
memory block (notwithstanding /E, which affect only command.com' memory)?
F Hmm, Arkady, you fixed yourself a bug (or at least complained about
