Hi!
25-Июн-2004 21:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> Hi all, Geraldo sent some FAT32 formatting logs (thanks!!),
EA> but I do not really get the magic here:
For whom you target this letter?
EA> Differences in MS FORMAT output depending on kernel: FreeDOS vers
Hi!
26-Июн-2004 13:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Vojta) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG:
PV> Thank you very much for the additional information. However, there's one
PV> bit of information missing. I assume that your analysis was all done do
Hi!
26-Июн-2004 20:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Ie. applications always get reduced (to size of contents) envrionment
>> memory block (notwithstanding /E, which affect only command.com' memory)?
F> Hmm, Arkady, you fixed yourself a bug (or at least complained
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:42:14PM +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG:
Thank you very much for the additional information. However, there's one
bit of information missing. I assume that your analysis was all done doing
things such
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Ie. applications always get reduced (to size of contents) envrionment
memory block (notwithstanding /E, which affect only command.com' memory)?
Hmm, Arkady, you fixed yourself a bug (or at least complained about a
bug) in the kernel's environment handling when invokin
Hi!
26-Июн-2004 16:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
F> FreeCOM does not use no internal buffer for the environment, but
F> performs all operations on the environment segment.
Ie. applications always get reduced (to size of contents) envrionment
memory block (notwit
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
2Steffen Kaiser: Steffen, how FreeCOM handles /E option? I mean, how
this options affects environment? Is it _limits_ size of internal buffer,
It resizes the block of memory the environment of FreeCOM resides in.
which later used to make environment of new applications
Hi,
Good effort!
I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG: application
PSP
inside FD-DEBUG have as parent debug's PSP, which have as parent itself
(ie.
it makes itself "primary shell", which shouldn't be terminated by
INT21/4C).
App PSP inside MS-DEBUG have as parent the PSP, wh
Hi,
Good effort!
I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG: application
PSP
inside FD-DEBUG have as parent debug's PSP, which have as parent itself
(ie.
it makes itself "primary shell", which shouldn't be terminated by
INT21/4C).
App PSP inside MS-DEBUG have as parent the PSP, wh
Hi!
I found the difference between FD-DEBUG and MS-DEBUG: application PSP
inside FD-DEBUG have as parent debug's PSP, which have as parent itself (ie.
it makes itself "primary shell", which shouldn't be terminated by INT21/4C).
App PSP inside MS-DEBUG have as parent the PSP, which is parent a
10 matches
Mail list logo
