[Freedos-devel] UDMA2 poll

2005-01-09 Thread tom ehlert
Hi everybody Happy new year first. I want to ask the general audience about UDMA(2)'s compatibility with chipsets. UDMA will accelerate many/most of current chipsets, but unfortunately it seems to kill some (few?) chipsets and mustn't be used on those. unfortunately the 'sometimes bad' makes it

Re: [Freedos-devel] UDMA2 poll

2005-01-09 Thread tom ehlert
I forgot to mention one VERY important thing: what information to provide. please send device- and vendor ID as reported by UDMA AMD/Intel CPU approximate age and - of course - GOOD, BAD, HARMLESS tom --- The SF.Net email is

Re: [Freedos-devel] UDMA2 poll

2005-01-09 Thread Jim Hall
tom ehlert wrote: I forgot to mention one VERY important thing: what information to provide. please send device- and vendor ID as reported by UDMA AMD/Intel CPU approximate age and - of course - GOOD, BAD, HARMLESS tom It would be interesting to see how the behavior changes in the

[Freedos-devel] Fwd: WinDOS 270 GPL

2005-01-09 Thread Jim Hall
Denis wanted me to fwd this to the FreeDOS developers, so here you go. Screenshots are at http://www.student.unimelb.edu.au/~denisa/screen.htm I don't intend to add this to the FreeDOS GUI Software List. Actually, since our recent (18 Dec) discussion thread about SEAL GEM, I've been thinking