Hi at all,
can you create a live cd ! like linux for 1.1 distro with
choiche for :
1) booting and working form cd (live mode)
2) booting
from cd and wizard installer (like m$ dos or dr dos)
This for semplify
installation/test.
In ODIN can you create a wizard for installing like
commercial
Hi Bernd,
I'm happy with whatever I can get. My real hardware has an Nvidia
chipset network driver for which no packet drivers exist, so sticking to
virtual machines. I wonder if any PCI (or even PCI-express or onboard)
network cards still support packet drivers.
You probably can still
On 7/6/2011 7:10 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Op 7-7-2011 1:32, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
mTCP FTP compares poorly to the native stack and FireFox there, but FTP
is working in a very limited environment:
* The TCP/IP socket receive buffer is tiny compared to the native
network stack
On 7/6/2011 7:10 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
For DHCP I can imagine various errorlevels for different reasons:
* missing MTCPCFG variable
* MTCPCFG variable points to non-existing file
* missing PACKETINT keyword in file
* unable to write to MTCPCFG file (yay hidden/readonly)
* packetdriver not
On 7/6/2011 7:10 PM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
That funny URI syntax was grafted on. What exact URI are you using? Are
you adding ftp://; or just // ?
FreeCOM (maybe also MSDOS command.com or 4DOS) seem to split arguments
at the / level. See the FOR LOOP in my batchfile, with batchfile
called as:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
I'm happy with whatever I can get. My real hardware has an Nvidia
chipset network driver for which no packet drivers exist, so sticking to
virtual machines. I wonder if any PCI (or even PCI-express or onboard)
network cards still support packet drivers.
Op 7-7-2011 14:08, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
I have resisted getting too detailed with the errorlevels because I
would need to make them consistent across all of the applications. At
some point I'm not going to control all of the applications, so I won't
be able to enforce it. The user
Op 7-7-2011 15:37, Steve Nickolas schreef:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
I think the RTL-8139 chipset does and it's still quite common.
And there I was, wanting high-performant low-CPU network cards (with
also packet drivers):
* Intel Gigabit PCI-card (10/100Mbit fallback)
* Intel
Op 7-7-2011 13:58, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
Most of my testing is on lower-end machines, like a 386-40 and the
various 8088 machines that I have. The performance of memcpy is far
better on the newer processors due to pipeline efficiency and levels of
caching. (Even the 386-40 has a 128K
Just for grins I did a little speed testing comparing mTCP running in a
VM to native FTP under Windows XP. Here are the results:
File size: 32MB
Source: Linux 2.6.x running on a Pentium 233, local 100Mb/sec connection
Windows XP command line FTP client: ~8950KB/sec
LFTP running under Cygwin:
Op 7-7-2011 20:07, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
Windows XP command line FTP client: ~8950KB/sec
LFTP running under Cygwin: ~8850KB/sec
mTCP, VMWare 3.13, PCNet emulation, standard buffer sizes: ~3950KB/sec
mTCP, VMWare 3.13, PCNet emulation, max buffer sizes: ~6826KB/sec
Odd that my download
Hi Bernd,
My own testing sometimes involves a solid state disk, other
times a ramdrive. Bye latencies :)
SSD have a quite noticeable per-write latency. The reason why
you do not notice it with Windows or Linux is that those may
use NCQ (queueing of concurrent disk I/O activities) and will
12 matches
Mail list logo
