Hi,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Mercury Thirteen
wrote:
>
> In keeping with Tom's earlier suggestion, I give you Drives, the disk info
> tool - now in standalone form! :)
>
> It's still a bit buggy - I have to sort out an issue with repeating drive
> labels and a couple other odds and ends -
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Mercury Thirteen
wrote:
>
> No problem! Yeah, PowerBASIC was a great product which produced some of the
> fastest apps around.
"Fast" is subjective (unless you mean compile-time speed, which I'm
assuming here). There are too many diverse x86 machines (with
di
I don't know how thorough you want to be, but msdos 5+, and some versions of
both opendos and ptsdos, you can actually have more than 26 drives, up to 32 if
I remember correctly. I saw (once) which characters they used for the
additional 6 drives, but I don't remember what they were. Looking i
In keeping with Tom's earlier suggestion, I give you *Drives*, the disk
info tool - now in standalone form! :)
It's still a bit buggy - I have to sort out an issue with repeating drive
labels and a couple other odds and ends - but 90% of the program is usable
and functional. Just type "drives" and
TrueBasic (www.truebasic.com) still sells the DOS version of their
compiler, but it's not actively developed any more.
> -Original Message-
> From: Travis Siegel [mailto:tsie...@softcon.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:16 PM
> To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS de
I am making a new dos game with the help of a few friends!
wanna help out?
search "sparky4 project 16" on github ~
--
with love,
sparky4
Administrator of 四葉の芽◇ちゃんねる
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The G
>
> Thanks for that, grabbed it.
> As far as I know, powerbasic is the only company that still actively sells
> and supports a dos compiler. Their version 3.5 is still available for
> purchase. I have their windows version too, though I'm 1 version back
> (running pbcc 5.0, and pbwin 8.0), but st
On Dec 23, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote:
>> (btw, I'm a huge powerbasic fan, do you have your old code available
> somewhere? I'd love to have a look at it.
>
> I hear you there, PowerBASIC was awesome in its day and in fact it was the
> using of this language that let me get my GUI
Hi, Travis, and thanks for the feedback!
> Are you kidding? There's been many many times I wanted a feature that
would allow me to do a dos function in the background while I kept doing
whatever it was I was already doing in the foreground. A way to switch to
a second shell, do something, and swi
Are you kidding? There's been many many times I wanted a feature that would
allow me to do a dos function in the background while I kept doing whatever it
was I was already doing in the foreground. A way to switch to a second shell,
do something, and switch back would be fantastic.
(btw, I'm a
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
> in a new implemented, most likely buggy way (FreeCOM also had bazillion
of bugs which were removed over much time and effort)
Hopefully not! :)
> can it run batches?
As of right now, no, but in its final form, yes. It supports all the
env
> It will provide all the typical features of the base shell,
in a new implemented, most likely buggy way (FreeCOM also had
bazillion of bugs which were removed over much time and effort)
can it run batches?
whats the resident footprint?
> including the following new features:
> -The new "drive
12 matches
Mail list logo
