Re: [Freedos-devel] Typo correction to Re: proposal for extension of font format V8F

2025-02-09 Thread Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel
> On Feb 9, 2025, at 10:48 AM, Ladislav Lacina via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > I think that I managed to finish support for yout V8F format for opening and > saving. > Try this new build: http://www.laaca.borec.cz/kasmar_g.zip > > Laaca :-) I did a couple quick tests… Loaded an existing V

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread tom ehlert via Freedos-devel
Hallo Herr Fritz Mueller via Freedos-devel, am Sonntag, 9. Februar 2025 um 19:06 schrieben Sie: > Hi Tom, > I am not happy that I have to do this now, but I think it is time "to wash > your head". Cholerical attacks are not nice for you and others, but as I had > several of your attacks over th

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel
On 09.02.2025 19:06, Fritz Mueller via Freedos-devel wrote: [...] but format still does not support full 2 TB, only something a little below, but this makes it hard for USERS (like me) to understand the correct usage if fdisk says "this is the maximum size" and format gives an error message be

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro via Freedos-devel
Yes. It should. El dom., 9 feb. 2025 19:43, Bret Johnson via Freedos-devel < freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> escribió: > Does ZEROFILL work correctly with with disks/media that have sector sizes > other than 512 bytes? > > > ___ > Freedos-devel ma

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Bret Johnson via Freedos-devel
Does ZEROFILL work correctly with with disks/media that have sector sizes other than 512 bytes? ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Bret Johnson via Freedos-devel
> MS-DOS v6 or v7.00 return for all 21.73 functions is actually "AL = 0, > *CF unchanged*", which is the CP/M style error return for unsupported > functions. If you take care to pre-init CY (Carry Flag set) before the > call then these versions of DOS will return AX = 7300h, CY, as they > will leav

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Fritz Mueller via Freedos-devel
Hi Tom, I am not happy that I have to do this now, but I think it is time "to wash your head". Cholerical attacks are not nice for you and others, but as I had several of your attacks over the last years I think it is time that you excuse yourself to me and others as I am not the only one. That's

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Guti
> Nice. However correctly handling 4GB+ disks correctly might be expected from > a 2.0.5 utility. I guess there was a typo since he already tested with 2TB (was meant to be TB and not GB). Indeed Zerofill supports GB since 10 years ago! >Please spare us this marketing BLA. Fixing bugs is nice, b

Re: [Freedos-devel] Typo correction to Re: proposal for extension of font format V8F

2025-02-09 Thread Ladislav Lacina via Freedos-devel
I think that I managed to finish support for yout V8F format for opening and saving. Try this new build:  http://www.laaca.borec.cz/kasmar_g.zip Laaca -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel Komu: FreeDOS Developers Kopie: jer...@shidel.net Datum: 8. 2

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread tom ehlert via Freedos-devel
Hallo Herr Fritz Mueller via Freedos-devel, am Sonntag, 9. Februar 2025 um 13:48 schrieben Sie: > Hi Eric, hi all, > > I am happy to inform you that Nikkho published version 2.0.5 of ZEROFILL. > It fixed a lot of minor bugs, among others it was unable to write more than 2 > GB with FD and

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel
> Am 09.02.2025 um 15:17 schrieb E. C. Masloch via Freedos-devel > : > > MS-DOS v6 or v7.00 return for all 21.73 functions is actually "AL = 0, *CF > unchanged*", which is the CP/M style error return for unsupported functions. Interesting. Then this[1] section of RBIL is imprecise. Maybe Jer

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread E. C. Masloch via Freedos-devel
Hi Bernd, MS-DOS v6 or v7.00 return for all 21.73 functions is actually "AL = 0, *CF unchanged*", which is the CP/M style error return for unsupported functions. If you take care to pre-init CY (Carry Flag set) before the call then these versions of DOS will return AX = 7300h, CY, as they will

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel
> Am 01.02.2025 um 23:58 schrieb Eric Auer via Freedos-devel > : > > I hear that ZEROFILL does notice when drives are > 2047 MB > in EDR-DOS but not in FreeDOS, even when using FAT32 kernels? > > Is there something in FAT32 interface use where ZEROFILL has > issues with FreeDOS, while working

Re: [Freedos-devel] ZEROFILL R2.01 Released (was ZEROFILL R2.00 Releas ed)

2025-02-09 Thread Fritz Mueller via Freedos-devel
Hi Eric, hi all,   I am happy to inform you that Nikkho published version 2.0.5 of ZEROFILL. It fixed a lot of minor bugs, among others it was unable to write more than 2 GB with FD and if you delete the zerofile files it shows that they are deleted (in older versions you could not see that it