- will be modified by LEA; the segment override will be ignored
completely. (
Ralf's explanation is correct; LES loads both ES and the destination
register (DI) with the full far pointer/16:16 address.
-- Daniel Verkamp
--
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Verkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Matt inson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, I just wanted to ask a simple question. Would command line interfaces
>> look better on laptops and other LCD scre
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Matt inson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I just wanted to ask a simple question. Would command line interfaces
> look better on laptops and other LCD screens if they are using black text on
> white backgrounds, rather than the usual reverse (white text on black,
tec AntiVirus 10.1.0.396, scan engine
71.1.0.11, virus definitions 3/2/2007 rev. 20, and no viruses were
found. According to
http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/threatexplorer/azlisting.jsp?azid=B
this virus (Barrotes.1194) is detected by their d
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Just to butt in :-) I understand jnc/jc/jz/jnz myself but I don't even
> know what jae is. I would also prefer jnc/jz over jae or je.
>
>
ja/jae and jb/jbe are "jump if above/below", which work the same way as
jg/jge and jl/jle, except treating the operands as unsigned
Tony wrote:
> After that I decided that I needed to run CHKDSK on my hard drive. Big
> mistake. CHKDSK did fine on my floppy, but several files in the file
> system on C: were reported as being around 4,294,901,760 bytes (4096K
> give or take) some even more. So acting as a typical user, (even
N
Eric Auer wrote:
> I would appreciate some FreeBASIC command line options to
> set default types (QB: single for variables, 16bit for INTEGER,
> FB: integer for variables, 32bit for INTEGER). That would
> make FreeBASIC ("command line optionally"!) behave even more
> like QuickBASIC, where appropri
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Does the ISO I just re-uploaded work now? (I know, it's kinda cheating).
>
>
No, it behaves the same way as the original.
BTW, Virtual PC is available for free now if you would like to test it
yourself - http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/downloads/sp1.mspx
---
Blair Campbell wrote:
> How did you run the installer?
>
I booted from the CD, created a single 2GB primary partition using
xfdisk, rebooted, formatted C:, and followed the defaults on the package
selection screen. At this point, postinst.bat executed and produced
this error. I tried the in
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Hey folks. If you check out the website, you may be in for a surprise.
>
>
Excellent work! However, in testing the base CD in Virtual PC 2004, I
came across this problem during postinst.bat:
Batchfile 'C:\FDOS\POSTINST.BAT' does not contain label 's4_801586'.
I ha
your hard disk." This doesn't make sense with the CD, but it's not a
major issue.
-- Daniel Verkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's T
Blair Campbell wrote:
> Uploaded to
> www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/1.0-Testing/fdbasecd.iso
> is an updated BASE CD-ROM ISO. Hopefully, the bugs that plagued users
> of the last distribution should be gone, and I would greatly
> appreciate testing from ones where
Blair Campbell wrote:
>> About command line limitation: NDOS/4DOS and newer command.com place
>> complete, untruncated command line into CMDLINE environemnt variable.
>>
>
> What does everybody think about FreeCOM supporting this? Of course,
> it is possibly useless without C runtimes s
13 matches
Mail list logo
