Just because there is a legal license doesn't mean any money was involved.
It could have been granted free for PR purposes, there might have been
some kind of cross-licensing agreement, or there might be some restrictive
conditions on its use.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Johnson
I think he meant "file system", not "file".
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Quint [mailto:freedos...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 9:14 PM
> To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] exfat support from android linux for
> freedos sdxc
Because it's a Patent (rather than a trade secret or copyright) issue, you
ALSO have to be sure you don't do things the same way the patent does.
That is still infringement even if you do it completely independently.
===
David C. Kerber
WRA in-house e-mail
x-111
C++ is quite commonly used for desktop applications with low performance
requirements, on machines with plenty of horsepower. As you say, it's
rather a resource hog.
-Original Message-
From: imre.le...@telenet.be [mailto:imre.le...@telenet.be]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:47 AM
If you buy a Dell machine without an OS already installed, it comes with a
boot CD that boots to FreeDOS...
-Original Message-
From: JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU [mailto:jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:37 AM
To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS
-Original Message-
From: JAYDEN CHARBONNEAU [mailto:jcharbonnea...@cpsge.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 7:22 AM
To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS compatibility issue according to
Asus
I have heard of SeaBIOS,but I
I haven't checked on how he licensed them on the web site, but just because
the source code is publicly posted doesn't mean it's Public domain. That
term has a specific legal meaning. So checking with the author is a good
idea unless he specifically says that it's ok for anyone to use for any
TrueBasic (www.truebasic.com) still sells the DOS version of their
compiler, but it's not actively developed any more.
-Original Message-
From: Travis Siegel [mailto:tsie...@softcon.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:16 PM
To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS
-Original Message-
From: Mateusz Viste [mailto:mate...@viste.fr]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:50 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] OpenWatcom-produced binaries:
why are they so big?
Hi Eric,
No, I didn't try to optimize the code by
Are you talking about real Java, or JavaScript in your comment about
performance? JavaScript has nothing to do with real Java...
-Original Message-
From: Charles Belhumeur [mailto:chbelhumeur2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:18 PM
To: Technical discussion and
How long has it been since you've done performance tests on Java? JRE 1.5
was a HUGE performance jump from 1.4, and 1.6 was another smaller but
still significant jump from 1.5.
And switching to the Server JVM from the client can get you another order
of magnitude gain, though it depends on what
-Original Message-
From: Charles Belhumeur [mailto:chbelhumeur2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 2:12 AM
To: Technical discussion and questions for FreeDOS developers.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] Do not use any code from ms-dos releASE!
...
IT in our lives like
12 matches
Mail list logo
