Re: [Freedos-devel] Comments & suggestions

2010-02-24 Thread usul
Where are all the updated files? Thanks, Adam -- Download IntelĀ® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. S

Re: [Freedos-devel] Current Version Files

2009-04-05 Thread usul
server.net/wip/ If this is already done, not named what I am expecting it to be or if it is kept somewhere else. I did find http://blairdude.googlepages.com/fdav and I am wondering if it is the same as Clam AntiVirus 0.92

[Freedos-devel] Current Version Files

2009-04-03 Thread usul
When I am reviewing current files to check to see if there has been a change and I find a current file (1.0) that is not in the correct format should I redo it in the correct format? usul

[Freedos-devel] 7Zip package problem

2009-04-03 Thread usul
I am trying to double check to see if a new package needs to be built for 7Zip. I cannot open the one on the wip page http://www.viste-family.net/mateusz/fdupdate/wip/ can anyone unzip this? If anyone else cannot then I will redo this one. thanks, usul

[Freedos-devel] Getting Started with creating packages

2009-04-02 Thread usul
Ah another sleep apnea night :P Getting Started with creating packages or trying anyway. I am grabbing everything from all the directory with FileZilla Are the new files in devel or under the individual directories both places? or should I follow only the web software list thanks Usul

Re: [Freedos-devel] Eric

2009-04-02 Thread usul
Blair, Thank you I will review this this evening. Does this work the same for base freedos vs complex? for example APPEND vs OPENGEM. And can these packages be safely built in xp. I blew away my freedos partition last night trying to install linux on a second partition. not even fdisk /mbr is he

Re: [Freedos-devel] Eric

2009-04-01 Thread usul
Exactly! I think maybe I talk funny. :P Usul On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Michael Reichenbach wrote: > I think he wants to help packaging and wants to know a package which he > can use for reference because it's 100% correct. > > -mr > > Eric Auer schrieb: >>

Re: [Freedos-devel] Eric

2009-04-01 Thread usul
thats ok too. Just want to make sure that I get them correct. Usul On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Eric Auer wrote: > > Hi Usul, > >> Is there any single package that you know of that is 100% the >> way you want it? If so can you link it so I can get started. :) > >

[Freedos-devel] Eric

2009-03-31 Thread usul
Is there any single package that you know of that is 100% the way you want it? If so can you link it so I can get started. :) -- ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@list

[Freedos-devel] Volunteer

2009-03-31 Thread usul
arded message -- From: Eric Auer Date: Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:53 AM Subject: [Freedos-devel] collecting components for freedos 1.1 - was: volunteering To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Usul, to collect packages for freedos 1.1, you would work with Mateusz of FDUPDATE and Rugxu

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-28 Thread usul
fdpkg requires c:\FDOS? how do you maintain a working existing environment along side the beta one even following the existing structure and using c:\FDOSBETA or something acceptable. perhaps fdpkg could be modified to use a database to store where the packages are came from etc. Is there a open

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-28 Thread usul
I am not ready to write driver code, yet. My main an interest is in designing writing a gui/desktop, and in writing libraries that can be shared and used by command line application as well as gui. But I also have an interest device and similar programming. I think FreeDos relies alot on closed s

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-28 Thread usul
Japheth, Politics of any sort are this way. It is always extremes that shout the loudest. In my opinion is aways in the middle the answer always is in the middle, the middle rarely if ever has an advocate. :P I like open source and free software. More the spirit of the law though then the law its

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-27 Thread usul
> You could put toghether FreeDOS 1.1... > most programs have new versions that are ok, but what is mostly needed > is put all of it toghether, test new versions, fix a few things and This sounds like a good task for me to start. And I am most certainly willing. Would this be pulling together the

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-27 Thread usul
> I agree, the FreeDOS installer is currently a bit annoying, you must > click and wait a dozens of time. Would be better first to choose all > packets or to click just go ahead and install everything without bugging > around. > > -mr Part that I hated most was that I had to keep clicking. Yes I

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-27 Thread usul
Thanks everyone. Very helpful! I have ordered Some books :) "FreeDOS Kernel; An MS-DOS Emulator for Platform Independence and Embedded Systems Development" "Undocumented DOS: A Programmer's Guide to Reserved MS-DOS Functions and Data Structures/Book and Disk (Andrew Schulman Programming)" "Diss

Re: [Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-27 Thread usul
> > Hi, > > It would help if you tell us what is your interest in DOS and/or what > > you are using it most for. (recovery, backup, hardware testing, > > benchmark, web browsing, gaming, music player, server or whatever) > My main interest is programming and a challenge. Occasionally play some ol

[Freedos-devel] Volunteering

2009-03-27 Thread usul
Dev Team, I am very nearly completed on the setup of freedos. all I need now is the network card, its in the mail. :) But I can copy floppy by floppy if I have to :) I am very interested in helping. If you have any tasks that you need done, even if it is unglamorous. I'll take it. :) Not sure ho