At 12:18 AM 3/28/2004 +0100, tom ehlert wrote:
>Michael,
>
>MD> Since you're the maintainer and overall "big picture"
>MD> operations man on EMM386
>well - I was the programing guy. Now someone else stepped in, and he
>has done GREAT. Now I'm left with administrative stuff ;)
>
>
>MD> and I've just
At 02:13 AM 3/28/2004 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>MD> compatibility (I like your suggestion to use percentage of extended memory
>MD> for VCPI much better than using Microsoft's fixed 256K for example). You
>
> Let me remind: "256K" is a default value for MIN= option. Requests over
>this
Michael,
MD> Since you're the maintainer and overall "big picture"
MD> operations man on EMM386
well - I was the programing guy. Now someone else stepped in, and he
has done GREAT. Now I'm left with administrative stuff ;)
MD> and I've just been handling the addition
MD> of a couple of features
Hi!
27-Мар-2004 16:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD> Once EMM386 gets debugged VCPI, I'm probably not going to be diddling around
MD> the EMM386 code much and generally causing trouble, other than wanting at
MD> some point to add the shared EMS/XMS memory pool
At 11:07 PM 3/27/2004 +0100, tom ehlert wrote:
>>> someone said EMM386 is incompatible with HLT instruction?
>
>MD> EMM386 uses the HLT instruction for its own purposes, but it
>MD> does a check if the HLT is coming from itself or externally.
>MD> Other than that, it looks like HLT causes the ex
