On Thu, 2 May 2024, Liam Proven via Freedos-devel wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 08:25, Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
wrote:
Everything but himem, dosshell, gwbasic, and parts of xmaem/xma2ems,
apparently. I got most of it compiled using the tools in the archive.
That being the case, is
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 08:25, Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
wrote:
> Everything but himem, dosshell, gwbasic, and parts of xmaem/xma2ems,
> apparently. I got most of it compiled using the tools in the archive.
That being the case, is it possible to get it working with 386MAX
instead, as
On Thu, 2 May 2024, Eric Auer via Freedos-devel wrote:
Hi!
I have no life - I can devote the time and energy to it, just don't have
the brainpower I'd like to think I have.
I hope that will get better :-o
Eric
Well, I certainly know more about C, 8088 ASM, and MS-DOS than I did going
Hi!
I have no life - I can devote the time and energy to it, just don't have
the brainpower I'd like to think I have.
I hope that will get better :-o
Eric
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, tom ehlert via Freedos-devel wrote:
I have no idea why I would recompile old MS stuff, but as a hobby it's
ok.
6.21 would be much more useful and no doubt a lot more people would want
to do what I'm trying to do for 4.01 with a 6.21 source drop.
(Even 5.0 would be more
Hallo Herr Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel,
am Dienstag, 30. April 2024 um 17:07 schrieben Sie:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel wrote:
>> Sadly not. Only the binaries are released under MIT through the repository.
>>
>>> Does that mean we finally have a genuinely open
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel wrote:
Sadly not. Only the binaries are released under MIT through the repository.
Does that mean we finally have a genuinely open sourced OMF linker?
-hpa
It's my opinion that including them was more of a fortuitous accident than
Sadly not. Only the binaries are released under MIT through the repository.
> Does that mean we finally have a genuinely open sourced OMF linker?
>
> -hpa
>
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 4:33 PM Han Held via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>
> For anyone interested, Neozeed has a youtube video that he put up that walks
> through the steps of fetching dos 4's source from github and building a
> bootable copy of it.
> [Compiling MS-DOS 4.0 using DOSbox & Qemu]
>
I
For anyone interested, Neozeed has a youtube video that he put up that walks
through the steps of fetching dos 4's source from github and building a
bootable copy of it.
Compiling MS-DOS 4.0 using DOSbox & Qemu
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Compiling MS-DOS 4.0 using DOSbox & Qemu
|
paul@fedora:~/MS-DOS/v4.0/src$ LANG=C diff OUTBIN/
/run/media/paul/2A43-1BF3/|grep -v ^Only
Binary files OUTBIN/LCD.CPI and /run/media/paul/2A43-1BF3/LCD.CPI differ
Binary files OUTBIN/SELECT.DAT and /run/media/paul/2A43-1BF3/SELECT.DAT differ
Binary files OUTBIN/SELECT.EXE and
I compared with Linux diff command files from
https://winworldpc.com/download/d93cf841-4562-11eb-b764-028a0da4
and the one I compiled...
had not compare all files, but the one I compared were identical (operating
disk 1-3)
Had to edit one to make sure it detect the diff.
Now, frankly, I feel stupid, because I think I would need a binary disk of
MS-DOS 4.0 to test the binary files of
MS-DOS 4.0 I compiled.
I guess this is where your bootimg.asm script and:
> nasm -I ../../lmacros/ -I ../../bootimg/ ../../bootimg/bootimg.asm
Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel wrote:
>
> Thank you ECM for the infos!
>
> I think my build did not finished normally.
> After about 1h build time on my i3-8100, dosbox finished with:
> Object Modules [.OBJ]: MAP DMA
> Run file [MEM386.EXE]: EMM386.EXE
> ...
> del emm386.sys
> File
May as well show the result:
mkdir outbin
cpy outbin
cd outbin
edlin.com
result in Incorrect DOS version
In Linux:
paul@fedora:~/MS-DOS/v4.0/src$ ls -lh OUTBIN
total 1,3M
-rw-r--r--. 1 paul paul 6,3K 27 avr 21:51 4201.CPI
-rw-r--r--. 1 paul paul 720 27 avr 21:51 4208.CPI
Using nmake > OUT.TXT
I have at the end of OUT.TXT:
cd ..\xmaem
nmake
nosrvbld xmaem.skl ..\..\messages\usa-ms.msg
Creating .CT? files for xmaem.skl using ..\..\messages\usa-ms.msg file of
messages.
SKL, MSG and IDX files have been opened for reading.
Writing to
Thank you ECM for the infos!
I think my build did not finished normally.
After about 1h build time on my i3-8100, dosbox finished with:
Object Modules [.OBJ]: MAP DMA
Run file [MEM386.EXE]: EMM386.EXE
...
del emm386.sys
File emm386.sys not found
D:\SRC
At some point, was making some
all GITHUB files have LF line endings.
as old MSDOS tools insist on CRLF line endings, you have to convert the files
first.
Tom
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To correct myself: I was getting a bunch of unrelated errors because I
made a mistake in my SETENV.BAT file. I set the CL, LINK, and MASM
variables to point to the executables (similar to what you might do on
Unix makefiles with CC, CFLAGS, etc)
But those variables are options to those commands
On at 2024-04-26 14:28 -0500, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel wrote:
Microsoft and IBM released the source code of MS-DOS 4.0 under MIT
license [1]. To me, it looks fairly complete.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:25 AM Steve Nickolas via
Jim Hall wrote:
[..]
> > But when I try to build it, it fails in the MAPPER directory with
> > "line too long":
> >
[..]
> >> cd ..\mapper
> >> nmake
> >>
> >> Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 1.00.05
> >> Copyright (c) Microsoft Corp 1987, 1988. All rights
Hi Jim,
>> D:\>nmake
>>
>> Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 1.00.05
>> Copyright (c) Microsoft Corp 1987, 1988. All rights reserved.
>>
>> NMAKE : fatal error U1051: usage : 'NMAKE' [-bcdeinpqrst -f makefile -x
>> stderrfi
>> le] [macrodefs] [targets]
>> Stop.
>
>
> But when
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jim Hall wrote:
>
[..]
> How did you compile it? I'm having trouble getting the compile to work.
>
> Here's what I'm doing: I've booted my system using FreeDOS but using
> their tools. My C: drive is FreeDOS, and my D: drive is empty except
> for the SRC directory
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel wrote:
>
> > Microsoft and IBM released the source code of MS-DOS 4.0 under MIT
> > license [1]. To me, it looks fairly complete.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:25 AM Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>
> Everything but himem, dosshell,
> Am 26.04.2024 um 09:08 schrieb Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
> :
>
> I got most of it compiled using the tools in the archive.
Side effect of having these tools in the repo is that these are released under
MIT license too, espectially:
- MASM 5.1
- Microsoft LINK 3.65
- Microsoft C
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Eric Auer via Freedos-devel wrote:
As mentioned by DOSEMU2 people, this is a somewhat exotic,
but interesting MS DOS 4.00, not the once widespread 4.01:
Actually, apart from having the io.sys sources to the multitasking 4, this
is the regular 4.x line from 1988. Most of
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel wrote:
Microsoft and IBM released the source code of MS-DOS 4.0 under MIT
license [1]. To me, it looks fairly complete.
Everything but himem, dosshell, gwbasic, and parts of xmaem/xma2ems,
apparently. I got most of it compiled using the
:viernes, 26 de abril de 2024, 8:23:03
Asunto: [Freedos-devel] MS-DOS 4.0 source released as open source under
MIT license
Archivos:
--===--
Hi Bernd,
> Microsoft and IBM released the source code of MS-DOS
Hi Bernd,
Microsoft and IBM released the source code of MS-DOS 4.0
under MIT license [1]. To me, it looks fairly complete.
Greetings, Bernd
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0
As mentioned by DOSEMU2 people, this is a somewhat exotic,
but interesting MS DOS 4.00, not
Microsoft and IBM released the source code of MS-DOS 4.0 under MIT license [1].
To me, it looks fairly complete.
Greetings, Bernd
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/MS-DOS/tree/main/v4.0
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
30 matches
Mail list logo
