On 8/18/06, Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone wanted to create a ruckus, they could point out that every time
someone allowed a commercial program for testing and debugging be sent to
anyone else, they technically violated copyright. And that's been accepted
practice for
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Andreas Bollhalder wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Laire wrote:
I think it's quite clear that www.bootdisk.com is a warez-site.
Where did you read that ? Do you really know, that they don't have asked
for permission ? I saw this site
Hi!
19-Авг-2006 15:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Laire) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
ML You didn't mention the software there, only the license, so I throught
ML that you meant that you could give a license to someone else, and
ML he/she should then download the program from
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote:
On 8/17/06, Mark Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael:
Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
Is that legal?
I didn't find any kind of legal FAQ from that site.
Nope.
-uso.
Hi!
Try www.bootdisk.com. ...
Is that legal?
Nope.
So FreeDOS 1.0 will be buggy software,
created using illegal software.
I would not say so. Michael compared MS DOS behaviour to
FreeDOS behaviour to find a bug. To ensure compatibility
(interoperability), even limited reverse engineering
On 8/18/06, Lyrical Nanoha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote:
On 8/17/06, Mark Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael:
Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
Is that legal?
I didn't find any kind of legal FAQ from that
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
Try www.bootdisk.com. ...
Is that legal?
Nope.
So FreeDOS 1.0 will be buggy software,
created using illegal software.
I would not say so. Michael compared MS DOS behaviour to
FreeDOS behaviour to find a bug. To ensure compatibility
(interoperability), even
Hi!
18-Авг-2006 13:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Laire) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
Is that legal?
I didn't find any kind of legal FAQ from that site.
Nope.
ML So FreeDOS 1.0 will be buggy software,
On 8/18/06, Andre Tertling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not say so. Michael compared MS DOS behaviour to
FreeDOS behaviour to find a bug. To ensure compatibility
(interoperability), even limited reverse engineering
would have been allowed in Germany. But that was not
IMHO reverse
On 8/18/06, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably know that MS DOS 1.0 did not even
support subdirectories... ;-). While FreeDOS 1.0
is delayed because we keep adding features to our
wishlist. Some of which are beyond MS DOS 6.xx!
I wasn't really thinking MS DOS 1.0, but the
Markus Laire wrote:
I don't really know if it's legal to use illegally acquired program if
you have a license for the program but not the program itself.
Do you really want to start a lengthy discussion about whether I am
using a legitimately created backup with my original license or not? For
At 01:06 PM 8/18/2006 +0200, Andre Tertlingwrote:
P.S. I am sure I have a stack of MS-DOS licenses somewhere in the
basement. If someone really wants to have one, feel free to apply.
Heck, I still have at least two sets of MS-DOS floppies down in basement
somewhere. Don't know if they work,
So to end this thread, since Michael already seems to own MS-DOS but
just wants an easier way of getting it on his hard drive, it is
perfectly legal to use.
On 8/18/06, Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:06 PM 8/18/2006 +0200, Andre Tertlingwrote:
P.S. I am sure I have a stack of
At 10:54 AM 8/18/2006 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
So to end this thread, since Michael already seems to own MS-DOS but
just wants an easier way of getting it on his hard drive, it is
perfectly legal to use.
Well, who doesn't have legal MS-DOS, if they ever had a machine back
when. It was
I feel it's important to get 1.0 out there to draw a line in the sand,
that we're at least 1.0 quality. We can do what MS-DOS could do. Maybe
we have a few bugs, but (and maybe this is a sad fact) what 1.0
software doesn't have bugs? People expect it. But marking a 1.0
release means you can
Hi Michael:
Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
floppy. It wants a disk drive...if you don't have one, I'd suggest
using VFD to capture the image. (A very useful program that assigns
a drive letter to a virtual floppy disk drive and can use a file
as a floppy).
At 04:54 PM 8/17/2006 -0400, Mark Bailey wrote:
Try www.bootdisk.com. boot622.exe will extract a usable MSDOS boot
floppy.
Cool deal. What you sent boots up under Qemu no problemo. Thanks.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do
17 matches
Mail list logo
